Samples of the compound (Tl5Pb2)Ba2Mg2Cu9O17+ were delivered to Oak Ridge Labs on December 18, 2013, and tests were performed using a commercial SQUID magnetometer. Magnetization tests ranged from 250K to 350K with two different test criteria. Magnetic susceptibility was first measured with an applied magnetic field of 20 Gauss (red dots). This produced considerable scattering of the data points. Then another test was done with a higher applied magnetic field of 1 Tesla (blue dots). This produced a nearly straight line with much less scatter (see plot upper left). Readings were taken every 0.5K and the bulk material characterized as a "weak paramagnet" overall. However within the blue line representing the 1 Tesla data points was a visible negative shift near 302K, indicating a small diamagnetic component at 28.5 Celsius.
This diamagnetic shift, representing the Meissner transition, was not noticed the day of the tests, due to its small amplitude within a row of large dots. However, when the plot was later loaded into a graphics program and a thin line drawn down the middle of the dots, it became apparant (see above)
The Meissner transition in the plots represents about 10 milli-Gauss with a -10db noise floor. The original test pellet weighed about 1 gram. However, the O.R.N.L. sample was only 38.6 mg, producing a much weaker signal.
Meanwhile, resistance tests of this material at O.R.N.L. were inconclusive. The reason for this appears to be the lack of resolution in the O.R.N.L. test equipment. They report a source current of 100 ua across a sample with a bulk resistance of 5-25 ohms. This will produce less than a millivolt of signal across the secondary of a 4-point probe. And, as 3 bits of resolution are typically required to see a signal this weak, resolution below 1 microvolt is necessary.
If you liked this article, please give it a quick review on ycombinator or StumbleUpon. Thanks