Interesting ethical dilemma

Child with mind frozen by disease at 3 months of development has body growth halted at age 7 and 65 pounds Case for halting growth made to save child discomfort of menstruation and to enable easier care by care-givers.

These kinds of things I view practically and pragmatically. If those who object were willing to raise the funds to enable superior care without the treatment, then they might have the right to intervene and offer that option. But if the caregivers are on their own then they have the right to make what seems like one of a few ethical choices.

About The Author


Add comment

E-mail is already registered on the site. Please use the Login form or enter another.

You entered an incorrect username or password

Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment.