This ">
This ">
This ">
This ">
This ">
This ">

A step toward quantum computing with neutral atoms

Physicists at the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology have induced thousands of atoms trapped by laser beams to swap “spins” with partners simultaneously.

This “quantum square dance” may be useful in quantum computing with neutral atoms. Atoms are loaded into individual sites of a 3D grid of light made with laser beams. Initially all the atoms have the same “spin,” as indicated by their consistent color. Then, a radio-frequency field (shown as semi-transparent planes) is applied to flip the spins of atoms in every other site, and the sites are paired up, with one atom of each pair spin up (or 1) and the other spin down (or 0), as indicated by the two different colors. Then, all pairs are merged, which causes the atom partners to swap spins repeatedly. These oscillations have the effect of periodically “entangling” the atom pairs, a quantum phenomenon that links their properties even if they are later physically separated. Illustration: Trey Porto/NIST

The swapping process is a way of creating logical connections among data, crucial in any computer. A logic operation is the equivalent of an “if/then” statement, such as: If two qubits have opposite states, then they should exchange values. The logical connections in quantum computers are created using entanglement, which in effect allows for multiple simultaneous, correlated possibilities.

The NIST experiment was performed with about 60,000 rubidium atoms in a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), a special state of matter in which all atoms are in the same quantum state. They were trapped within a three-dimensional grid of light formed by three pairs of infrared laser beams. The lasers were arranged to create two horizontal lattices overlapping like two mesh screens, one twice as fine as the other in one dimension. This created many pairs of energy “wells” for trapping atoms.

The scientists attempted to place a single atom in each well, with one atom spin up (or 1) and the other down (or 0). Then, they merged all double wells to force each pair of atoms into the same well, where they could interact with each other. When two such identical atoms are forced into the same physical location, quantum mechanics imposes a specific type of symmetry (only two of four seemingly possible combinations of quantum states are allowed). Due to this restriction, the merged atoms oscillate between the condition in which one atom is 1 and the other is 0, to the opposite condition. This behavior is unique to identical particles.

As they swap spins, the atoms pass in and out of entanglement. At the “half-swap” points the spin of each atom is uncertain and, if measured, might turn out to be either up or down. But whatever the result, a measurement on the other atom, equally uncertain before the measurement, would be sure to be the opposite. This entanglement is the key feature that enables quantum computation. According to Porto, the work reported in Nature is the first time that quantum mechanical symmetry (“exchange symmetry”) has been used to perform such an entangling operation with atoms.

The current set-up is not directly scalable to an arbitrary computer architecture, Porto says, since it performs the same spin-swap in parallel for all pairs of atoms. Researchers are developing ways to address and manipulate any pair of atoms in the lattice, which should allow for scalable architectures. Furthermore, not all atoms participated in the swap process, primarily because of imperfect initial loading of the atoms in the lattice. (Some double-wells contained only one atom and had no partner to exchange with.) The scientists estimate that the swap worked for at least 65 percent of the double wells.

0 thoughts on “A step toward quantum computing with neutral atoms”

  1. I won’t take you up on that bet. DWave sounds very promising.

    I read that magazine that had the IEEE predictions from all of the different fields. I was very surprised at how skeptical most of these people were! Most IEEE fellows believed that following were unlikely in the next 50 years:

    Commercial quantum computers
    Self driving cars
    Photovoltaics >= 50% efficiency

    Additionally, most IEEE fellows also believed that the Moore’s law wall would be reached in the next 20 years. I believe that this would indicate the end of exponential growth in computing…

    There were a couple other technologies that were dismissed that I was surprised at too. Interestingly, the biology section seemed to be the most optimistic amongst all of the different fields. I guess that means that I am either very dillusional, or these IEEE fellows just aren’t able to look past today into the probable possibilities of tomorrow.

    Brian, what do you think of their optimism on the adoptation of fuel cells in the future? With all this talk of progress of ultracapacitors, do you think that fuel cells will be as big as they think?


Leave a Comment