Silicon electronics can be printed by Ink Jet printers

Kovio, sunnyvale startup, jas the world’s first all-printed silicon transistor capability. They will have roll to roll printing of computers. This is clearly a process that will get even better as the design rules shrink and as they use faster printing technology like Memjet This technology also has implications for better fabbers, rapid prototyping and rapid manufacturing over the next few years.

This could foreshadow some prior to nanofactories style breakthroughs. New near-nanotech could make breakthroughs that can drive cost and applications that cannot be matched by silicon CMOS tech. Ovonic quantum control devices on polymer might have a performance advantage instead of disadvantage versus silicon chips. New nanopatterning systems could get the component sizes down as well.

Super-electronics based on polymer or graphene might be made from far cheaper fabs and far greater flexibility in form factors and cost reductions and even higher volumes.

Better versions or alternatives to this technology might also transform solar photovoltaics.

Its “green” silicon ink for thin-film transistors (TFTs) that achieve the performance of polysilicon transistors, but at a third their price and consuming only 5 percent of the chemicals and 25 percent of the energy of single-crystal silicon. Kovio claimed that radio-frequency identification tags using its silicon ink will drop Kovio’s price from 15 cents today to 5 cents by 2008, when Kovio begins volume production of its inkjet-printed RFID tags.

Their thin-film silicon transistors have very high mobilities for a printed device and we can make both p-type and n-type devices for CMOS circuits. Right now their design rules are 20 micron, but they have 10 micron working in the lab, which is where Intel started in 1971. Intel’s first microprocessor used just over two thousand transistors: similarly, their first devices for RFID tags will use less than about a thousand transistors when we go into mass production by the end of next year [2008]

Kovio is building its own fab, which uses temperatures too high for plastic substrates (which is why Kovio uses a stainless steel foil substrate), but which does not require the expensive processing equipment and clean-room environment of single-crystal silicon fabs. Silicon ink devices can be fabricated on roll-to-roll printing equipment, which is how Kovio plans to dramatically drop the price of RFID tags and similar applications using all types of flexible electronics.

They can build a printable silicon fab for about $10 million, compared with $1 billion for a traditional silicon fab. They need only about five percent of the materials (one percent of substrate cost and three percent of the cycle time) to create new devices.

By way of comparison, single crystal silicon transistors today can achieve mobilities as high as 600 centimeters squared per volt second (sq cm/Vs), and polysilicon transistors, like those that drive LCD displays, have mobilities of about 100 sq cm/Vs. Unfortunately, there is a big gap between single-crystal silicon and the printable organic transistors that are being demonstrated at dozens of labs worldwide. Organic transistors have dismal electron mobilities of less than 1 sq cm/Vs in contrast with Kovio’s silicon ink, which rivals polysilicon with its 80 sq cm/Vs electron mobilities. Most important, silicon ink can produce transistors that are fast enough for RFID and most other electronic interface protocols.

About The Author

Add comment

E-mail is already registered on the site. Please use the Login form or enter another.

You entered an incorrect username or password

Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment.

2 comments

by Newest
by Best by Newest by Oldest
1

1. It is not that easy to make a high yield nuke. Look at N Korea with their semi-dud (1 kiloton).

2. How is security against Iranian nukes achieved by wasting money in Iraq ?

Note: I was for the initial entry into Iraq. The rolling up of the main standard armies in the first few weeks and months was what I expected. But the mistakes started by not being willing to get dirty and make hard choices like leaving the Bathist mostly in place but with a US selected bastard as a puppet.

Now the US is still not willing to make deals that for US interests which include getting out at a cheaper cost. also, the US can always drawdown now and then return when no one expects it and when the US has tech and situation lined up in their favor.

3. The US needs to move the technological goal posts on Iran and N Korea. Non-proliferation has delayed things but is now failing. The new shift should be to Active Denial and post-Proliferation denial. finish creating remote sensors to find the nukes and nuclear material from long range. Then create the systems for selective surgical strikes. Deep diggers etc...

4. Leaving Iraq means that you have more resources to focus on Iran but also on better tech etc..

5. The Kissinger period was the early 70's. The later 70s was the Carter period. Mistakes were made in both periods. But getting out of Vietnam has worked. Vietnam is now a capitalistic country. Communism is around only in small pockets and in a very bastardized form.

6. Hitting Manhattan with a small nuke would not destroy all of Manhattan and then both Iran and N Korea would be wasted in reprisal. The reprisal would not have to be nuclear. Rolling Thunder (massive conventional bombing) like in Vietnam but hitting cities and military installations instead of jungle.

2

How much money would it take to rebuild New York (with the exception of the New York Times) after it's hit with an Iranian nuke? I would like to see that estimate.

What were buying with our money is not a necessarily a better Iraq but a safer America. The Kissinger period to which he refers was the latter 1970's was disaster for American security>