Charlie Stross Wrong About Space Colonization and Singularity

Charlie Stross has a 21st Century FAQ which tells people to forget about space colonization and the Singularity.

99.999% of the human species who will never get off the planet are concerned. There’ll probably be a Mars expedition too. But barring fundamental biomedical breakthroughs, or physics/engineering breakthroughs that play hell with the laws of physics as currently understood, canned monkeys aren’t going to Jupiter any time soon, never mind colonizing the universe.

He talks about taking 2.5 years to get out to Jupiter. He talks about concerns about radiation exposure and other medical issues for long flights at near zero gravity. He talks about the difficulty in protecting people in space in small space craft

Orion Lets You Go Fast and Big
The abandoned technology that can be used is nuclear powered Orion. Orion configurations can deliver 1000Gs of acceleration. So then it is a matter of dialing back the performance to what the current capabilities that are available for handling acceleration.

Orion scales up to 8 million ton ships.

We know we can send people into interplanetary space for several days (Apollo). We could easily make the trip to Mars in days and then onto to Jupiter in days. We could bring supplies, radiation protection in cargo that is equivalent to several great pyramids or how many loaded aircraft carriers equivalents.

It will be too bad if we did not develop this capability until for some reason we had screwed up the Earth by not using workable technology because of irrational fears.

All it takes if for people to awaken to the fact that Orion can be safe or to develop a near-earth (moon or orbital) deployment or construction or to develop a political correct version of nuclear rocket (IEC fusion space propulsion).

This site analyzes past underground nuclear tests and geology and nuclear energy to kinetic energy to show how the one shot launch will work while containing fallout and not creating an EMP. Shows how leveraging existing geology and existing nuclear weapons and old research and tests shows how this can provide a multi-trillion jump start to the space age.

This article goes over a one shot variant of nuclear propulsion where all of the fallout can be contained.

For the technology singularity, nanotechnology is developing at a rapid pace and cognitive enhancement via advanced brain computer interfaces is rapidly developing. Carbon nanotubes can interface to neurons and nanoparticles can wirelessly activate neurons. Carbon nanotubes are rapidly being developed into complex electronics and computers. Working neuroprostethics (brain enhancement modules) appear no more than two decades away and could even be here in 3-5 years and the computers that are interfaced could have have exaflops or zettaflops or more in 5-10 years.

The early clinical application will be to help people with brain damage like long term memory.

The non-clinical side is carrying around more powerful wearable computers with reality overlay displays and sensors for environment and communication with the wearer. Plus some other non-invasive connections.

Brain scale synaptic networks and other methods of human brain emulation are rapidly advancing.

Physical enhancement is already here with military exoskeletons.

0 thoughts on “Charlie Stross Wrong About Space Colonization and Singularity”

  1. I am aware of a projected population crash projection for China.

    The one child policy did not get absolute enforcement and has been relaxed even more recently. People with more money are ignoring the financial penalties. It was never strictly enforced in the rural areas and most people lived in the rural areas and still do in spite of decades of migration.

    China still has a 1.73 fertility rate

    That fertility rate is higher than Canada’s, Russia, Spain, Italy, Germany about the same as Netherlands and Australia

    That is supposing that the reported fertility rate is accurate. With the partially enforced one child policy there probably are more rural births that are unreported and uncounted.

    The Economist magazine indicates that the province GDP estimates have averaged about 1% higher than the China national GDP. The provincial numbers proved to be right when the GDP was adjusted in the 2004 Census It also discusses the varying degrees of reliability of Chinese statistics.

    I believe urbanization will be a big factor in China maintaining higher GDP growth rates 2020-2025.

  2. Have you also factored in the coming population crash in China due to the affects of the One Child Policy (i.e disproportionate number of male children when compared to female childre), and the failure of China to spread its infrastructure investments outside of the coastal plains area.

  3. I read a cool National Geographic magazine entirely on China just recently. They talk about China’s amazing growth as well as some of their major hurdles/problems right now. Seems that water is going to be a huge issue for China in the next few decades. The Huang He was talked about a lot with its bad pollution as well as poor management (some years it doesn’t even reach the sea). I was looking at the maps and it seemed as though China gets a lot less rain than the US does. Maybe new technology will help with water, like ways to safely extract it from the sea or to condense it from the air?


Leave a Comment