Tesla and Elon Musk better proceed to vote on going private or Elon could be in trouble

by

Elon Musk could be in trouble if Tesla does not vote on the going private offer at $420.

Elon Musk twitter announcement on the buyout could look like stock fraud if they do not out the offer to a vote.

145 thoughts on “Tesla and Elon Musk better proceed to vote on going private or Elon could be in trouble”

  3. He has a fiduciary duty to let people know good news” No, he doesn’t. You don’t even know what ‘fiduciary’ even means, as proven by you r total misuse of it just now.

  6. He has a fiduciary duty to let people know good news””No”” he doesn’t. You don’t even know what ‘fiduciary’ even means”” as proven by you r total misuse of it just now.”””

  7. Then why do you lie about Musk so much? It’s because you have nothing and can;t stand to hear good news or the truth about the man or his endeavors…shoving that in your face is not “musk-Fluffing”. it’s just beating a lying, sockpuppetting troll. I hope you’re real short on Tesla and starve under a bridge, like trolls ought to.

  8. Then why do you lie about Musk so much? It’s because you have nothing and can;t stand to hear good news or the truth about the man or his endeavors…shoving that in your face is not musk-Fluffing””. it’s just beating a lying”” sockpuppetting troll.I hope you’re real short on Tesla and starve under a bridge”” like trolls ought to.”””

  9. And none of them are me, I only use this Id. But you’ve already admitted to having been “ShrillaryForPrison” you sockpuppeting troll.

  10. And none of them are me I only use this Id. But you’ve already admitted to having been ShrillaryForPrison”” you sockpuppeting troll.”””

  11. No, it does not, you idiot troll. In fact, he has a fiduciary duty to spread good news. Certainly, you will no more cite any law which backs up your BS than you will quote Muck making any retraction in a 2nd tweet as you’ve lied to claim. At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.

  12. No it does not you idiot troll. In fact he has a fiduciary duty to spread good news.Certainly you will no more cite any law which backs up your BS than you will quote Muck making any retraction in a 2nd tweet as you’ve lied to claim.At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus omnis voluptas assumenda est omnis dolor repellendus.

  14. I haven’t here yet and you still can’t quote the retraction”” you lied about. You id!0t troll.”””

  15. He has a fiduciary duty to let people know good news, you idiot troll, so that’s not “stock manipulation”. He should be fired or fined for failing that duty if he did not. qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum necessitatibus saepe eveniet ut et voluptates

  16. He has a fiduciary duty to let people know good news you idiot troll so that’s not stock manipulation””. He should be fired or fined for failing that duty if he did not.qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident”” similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus omnis voluptas assumenda est”” omnis dolor repellendus. Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum necessitatibus saepe eveniet ut et voluptates”””

  17. Doesn’t matter if it is ‘happenstance’. What matters is the law and whether he gets a free pass from it for engaging in stock manipulation with this tweets or not.

  18. Doesn’t matter if it is ‘happenstance’. What matters is the law and whether he gets a free pass from it for engaging in stock manipulation with this tweets or not.

  19. Musk doesn’t look African-American to me. And he’s from SA, which makes him an Afrikaaner-American, right?

  20. Musk doesn’t look African-American to me. And he’s from SA which makes him an Afrikaaner-American right?

  21. My deal isn’t not with Musk per se, as anyone who reads my posts would figure out. My deal is with the Kool-Aid drinking Musk Fluffers, as I EXPLICITLY make clear in my posts. So why are making things up that isn’t there?

  22. My deal isn’t not with Musk per se as anyone who reads my posts would figure out. My deal is with the Kool-Aid drinking Musk Fluffers as I EXPLICITLY make clear in my posts.So why are making things up that isn’t there?

  25. Nope. Securities law as it involves this incident is EXACTLY how I described it. You are just typing complete BS because you are a troll, Matteo.

  26. Nope. Securities law as it involves this incident is EXACTLY how I described it. You are just typing complete BS because you are a troll Matteo.

  27. Nope. That is not how securities law works, Matteo. Not in the US. this is why the SEC is investigating already…despite your lie that they wouldn’t.

  28. Nope. That is not how securities law works Matteo. Not in the US. this is why the SEC is investigating already…despite your lie that they wouldn’t.

  37. I call you a sockpuppet, because you are one. You’ve already admitted to changing your name regularly — so, sockpuppet.

  38. I call you a sockpuppet because you are one. You’ve already admitted to changing your name regularly — so sockpuppet.

  39. No moron. If he had a buyer at the time if the tweet who had agreed to buy at up to $420 a share, which is all he claimed, he’s in the clear. It id only any sport of fraud if he made that up. It doesn’t matter if other people with the power to stop the deal choose not to go for it.

  40. No moron. If he had a buyer at the time if the tweet who had agreed to buy at up to $420 a share which is all he claimed he’s in the clear. It id only any sport of fraud if he made that up.It doesn’t matter if other people with the power to stop the deal choose not to go for it.

  43. Warren, you are the troll who under other names you’ve already admitted to, and denied at others, have edited people’s comment without their permission and boasted of the money you spent buying from SolidOpinion the power to do so. You’ve already admitted you’ve changed your name regularly, if I remember you claimed you did so every 6 months or so. I have nothing to do with Luca or Matteo, and you have no credibility on the matter, because you are the self admitted name changing troll. ” The SEC is now peeing in your Kool-Aid! ” So what? He proves he had a buyer at the time to get the company taken private at up to $420 a share, and he’s in the clear. It doesn’t matter if other shareholders reject the deal, or go for some other dollar value. You are the liar claiming he ever retracted anything, and of course you have yet to quote that. You made it up.

  44. Warren you are the troll who under other names you’ve already admitted to and denied at others have edited people’s comment without their permission and boasted of the money you spent buying from SolidOpinion the power to do so. You’ve already admitted you’ve changed your name regularly if I remember you claimed you did so every 6 months or so. I have nothing to do with Luca or Matteo and you have no credibility on the matter because you are the self admitted name changing troll. The SEC is now peeing in your Kool-Aid! “”So what? He proves he had a buyer at the time to get the company taken private at up to $420 a share”” and he’s in the clear. It doesn’t matter if other shareholders reject the deal or go for some other dollar value.You are the liar claiming he ever retracted anything”” and of course you have yet to quote that.You made it up.”””

  47. Well the MSM media was so successful at doing that to Trump that I’m sure they’ll have no trouble…

  48. Well the MSM media was so successful at doing that to Trump that I’m sure they’ll have no trouble…

  49. Warren what is your deal with Musk. He literally does nothing company CEO’s don’t do all day long every day. I know I listen to them. He also has actually Delivered on a reusable launcher AND Tesla is getting better every year. So…..what is your obsession with the man. Because your starting to sound like that Oil company exec that got outed selling tesla short.

  50. Warren what is your deal with Musk. He literally does nothing company CEO’s don’t do all day long every day. I know I listen to them. He also has actually Delivered on a reusable launcher AND Tesla is getting better every year.So…..what is your obsession with the man. Because your starting to sound like that Oil company exec that got outed selling tesla short.

  51. Here is the thing, Musk called attention to the Media having no cloths. Stated he was going to make a sight where people could rate the media and Journalist. Sense then there have been nothing but bad stories about Musk. I am sure that’s just happenstance. The Media intends to tear Musk down till he is SJW compliant like the rest of the companies and rich. Then he is suddenly acceptable.

  52. Here is the thing Musk called attention to the Media having no cloths. Stated he was going to make a sight where people could rate the media and Journalist. Sense then there have been nothing but bad stories about Musk.I am sure that’s just happenstance.The Media intends to tear Musk down till he is SJW compliant like the rest of the companies and rich. Then he is suddenly acceptable.

  53. Attention TommyLucatroll & all the other Fluffers For Musk: The SEC is now peeing in your Kool-Aid! Bloomberg) — The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is intensifying its scrutiny of Tesla Inc.’s public statements in the wake of Elon Musk’s provocative tweet Tuesday about taking the electric-car company private, according to two people familiar with the matter. SEC enforcement attorneys in the San Francisco office were already gathering general information about Tesla’s public pronouncements on manufacturing goals and sales targets, according to the people who asked not to be named because the review is private. Now, attorneys from that office are also examining whether Musk’s tweet about having funding secured to buy out the company was meant to be factual.

  54. Attention TommyLucatroll & all the other Fluffers For Musk:The SEC is now peeing in your Kool-Aid!Bloomberg) — The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is intensifying its scrutiny of Tesla Inc.’s public statements in the wake of Elon Musk’s provocative tweet Tuesday about taking the electric-car company private according to two people familiar with the matter.SEC enforcement attorneys in the San Francisco office were already gathering general information about Tesla’s public pronouncements on manufacturing goals and sales targets according to the people who asked not to be named because the review is private.Now attorneys from that office are also examining whether Musk’s tweet about having funding secured to buy out the company was meant to be factual.”

  56. That’s the thing: He used the ‘sockpuppet’ world. That is what gave him away as Luca/Matteo Martini. You screwed up Matteo! hahahahahhttps://www.facebook.com/teo.martini

  64. Oh I get it. Established facts that ruin Tommy’s BS simply don’t matter””.Not surprised.”””

  67. Nope. Other way around. If what he says isn’t exactly true and proven to be so and the stock price is impacted by it, that’s securities fraud. SEC is now investigating. Poor Tommy the Musk Fluffer!

  68. Nope. Other way around. If what he says isn’t exactly true and proven to be so and the stock price is impacted by it that’s securities fraud.SEC is now investigating. Poor Tommy the Musk Fluffer!

  69. From WSJ: SEC Probes Tesla CEO Musk’s Tweets The regulator is examining whether Musk’s statement was truthful and why the disclosure was made on Twitter. WASHINGTON—U.S. regulators are asking Tesla Inc. whether Chief Executive Elon Musk was truthful when he tweeted that he had secured funding for what would be the largest-ever corporate buyout, people familiar with the matter said. Looks like Tommy the NBF Musk Fluffer is about to eat crow.

  70. From WSJ:SEC Probes Tesla CEO Musk’s TweetsThe regulator is examining whether Musk’s statement was truthful and why the disclosure was made on Twitter.WASHINGTON—U.S. regulators are asking Tesla Inc. whether Chief Executive Elon Musk was truthful when he tweeted that he had secured funding for what would be the largest-ever corporate buyout people familiar with the matter said.Looks like Tommy the NBF Musk Fluffer is about to eat crow.”

  71. He goes to jail also if the Board doesn’t deliver exactly what he tweeted. ” No moron, if the vote goes against it, he’s fine. He is in no legal or moral jeopardy at all, unless there was no deal with the private capital buyer to take it private.

  72. He goes to jail also if the Board doesn’t deliver exactly what he tweeted. “”No moron”” if the vote goes against it he’s fine. He is in no legal or moral jeopardy at all”” unless there was no deal with the private capital buyer to take it private.”””

  73. So collapsing they are expanding with no prospect of their prospects dimming. The last quarter doesn’t even really matter, because not enough investors are as silly as you are — they know it’s the next decades which matter, and only Tesla is really going in the correct direction. Eventually, Ford, GM, et al will follow. But not yet.

  74. So collapsing they are expanding with no prospect of their prospects dimming.The last quarter doesn’t even really matter because not enough investors are as silly as you are — they know it’s the next decades which matter and only Tesla is really going in the correct direction. Eventually Ford GM et al will follow.But not yet.

  75. Yes it is stopping. It seems they will show a profit 3rd quarter, and given the likelihood of their continued expansion and dominance of the battery EV market, they will raise all the cash they need to for any more R&D and expansion. That’s the opposite of collapsing, you ignorant PoS.

  76. Yes it is stopping. It seems they will show a profit 3rd quarter and given the likelihood of their continued expansion and dominance of the battery EV market they will raise all the cash they need to for any more R&D and expansion.That’s the opposite of collapsing you ignorant PoS.

  77. No moron, I’m just mocking your consistent stupidity with respect to all things Musk. You’ve claimed it’s obvious the USGov will take over SpaceX and you’ve claimed Tesla is headed for collapse, there is no trace of evidence for either. In fact, it all going the other way against you. The evidence the USGov will not nationalize SpaceX is, they have never done such a thing in the past and have no authority to do it either. We are not in wartime and even if we were, there is no evidence they would operate it better than Musk either (and quite the contrary). Tesla’s stock went quite against the trolls after even the most recent report, and the fundamentals of the company are excellent. They have a product they cannot satisfy the demand for yet, a product which iis already a better deal than its competition for easily 80% of the drivers in the country, and the sole reason they aren’t showing windfall profits is the pace of their expansion. They are a company 15 years old whose income has goner up 1000 fold in the last 10 years. The instant they don’t have to expand so aggressively, they become wildly profitably. People who don;t have such a stupidly shortsighted investment timeframe as you do want in. They want in at $420/share. You piss poor stupid troll. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, nec in esse nostro everti, erat illud mel an, mel ad aliquip vivendo legendos. Ius id fuisset luptatum, ex usu occurrence torquatos instructior, nobis omnes suscipit te sea. Vis at erat aperiri delicata, an phaedrum

  78. No moron I’m just mocking your consistent stupidity with respect to all things Musk. You’ve claimed it’s obvious the USGov will take over SpaceX and you’ve claimed Tesla is headed for collapse there is no trace of evidence for either. In fact it all going the other way against you.The evidence the USGov will not nationalize SpaceX is they have never done such a thing in the past and have no authority to do it either. We are not in wartime and even if we were there is no evidence they would operate it better than Musk either (and quite the contrary).Tesla’s stock went quite against the trolls after even the most recent report and the fundamentals of the company are excellent. They have a product they cannot satisfy the demand for yet a product which iis already a better deal than its competition for easily 80{22800fc54956079738b58e74e4dcd846757aa319aad70fcf90c97a58f3119a12} of the drivers in the country and the sole reason they aren’t showing windfall profits is the pace of their expansion. They are a company 15 years old whose income has goner up 1000 fold in the last 10 years. The instant they don’t have to expand so aggressively they become wildly profitably. People who don;t have such a stupidly shortsighted investment timeframe as you do want in. They want in at $420/share. You piss poor stupid troll.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet nec in esse nostro everti erat illud mel an mel ad aliquip vivendo legendos. Ius id fuisset luptatum ex usu occurrence torquatos instructior nobis omnes suscipit te sea. Vis at erat aperiri delicata an phaedrum

  79. No moron, it has to shown ahead of time he knew it would not be approved at $420 for it to be fraud or stock manipulation.

  80. No moron it has to shown ahead of time he knew it would not be approved at $420 for it to be fraud or stock manipulation.

  81. What does that have to do with your claim that Musk told the truth…w/o any evidence on your part to back it up?

  82. What does that have to do with your claim that Musk told the truth…w/o any evidence on your part to back it up?

  83. He goes to jail also if the Board doesn’t deliver exactly what he tweeted. So, Musk Boy said $420/share. But if the Board votes for only say, $400, that’s as bad as if they didn’t vote on it at all, as far as the legal jeopardy Musk will be in. Strangely, if they vote for a higher amount he still might be in trouble…but most likely just a slap by the FEC in that case.

  84. He goes to jail also if the Board doesn’t deliver exactly what he tweeted. So Musk Boy said $420/share. But if the Board votes for only say $400 that’s as bad as if they didn’t vote on it at all as far as the legal jeopardy Musk will be in. Strangely if they vote for a higher amount he still might be in trouble…but most likely just a slap by the FEC in that case.

  87. Also, even if the board approves, it has to be for that $420/per share amount that Musk tweeted. If it isn’t…even if it is say, $400, then his tweets become fraudulent stock manipulation evidence just as if the board didn’t vote at all.

  88. Also even if the board approves it has to be for that $420/per share amount that Musk tweeted. If it isn’t…even if it is say $400 then his tweets become fraudulent stock manipulation evidence just as if the board didn’t vote at all.

  91. Tesla collapse in 3 quarters at their current cash burn rate. ” Why pretend it stays there AND production doesn’t rise? Why would their increasing income trend stop? There’s no reason to think any of it will. Just pathological skepticism on your part.

  92. Tesla collapse in 3 quarters at their current cash burn rate. “”Why pretend it stays there AND production doesn’t rise? Why would their increasing income trend stop?There’s no reason to think any of it will. Just pathological skepticism on your part.”””

  93. Tesla collapse in 3 quarters at their current cash burn rate. Sure they could go private or sell stock or up production to 20k cars a week or do something clever but they are hemorrhaging cash at a prodigious rate and it cannot continue. I for one hope that Elon takes the money and retires on the Moon/Mars and plays with his rockets the way a seven year old boy plays with toy trains.

  94. Tesla collapse in 3 quarters at their current cash burn rate.Sure they could go private or sell stock or up production to 20k cars a week or do something clever but they are hemorrhaging cash at a prodigious rate and it cannot continue.I for one hope that Elon takes the money and retires on the Moon/Mars and plays with his rockets the way a seven year old boy plays with toy trains.

  97. “He has a fiduciary duty to let people know good news”

    No, he doesn’t. You don’t even know what ‘fiduciary’ even means, as proven by you r total misuse of it just now.

  98. Then why do you lie about Musk so much? It’s because you have nothing and can;t stand to hear good news or the truth about the man or his endeavors…shoving that in your face is not “musk-Fluffing”. it’s just beating a lying, sockpuppetting troll.

    I hope you’re real short on Tesla and starve under a bridge, like trolls ought to.

  100. No, it does not, you idiot troll. In fact, he has a fiduciary duty to spread good news.

    Certainly, you will no more cite any law which backs up your BS than you will quote Muck making any retraction in a 2nd tweet as you’ve lied to claim.

    At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.

  102. He has a fiduciary duty to let people know good news, you idiot troll, so that’s not “stock manipulation”. He should be fired or fined for failing that duty if he did not.

    qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum necessitatibus saepe eveniet ut et voluptates

  103. Doesn’t matter if it is ‘happenstance’. What matters is the law and whether he gets a free pass from it for engaging in stock manipulation with this tweets or not.

  105. My deal isn’t not with Musk per se, as anyone who reads my posts would figure out.

    My deal is with the Kool-Aid drinking Musk Fluffers, as I EXPLICITLY make clear in my posts.

    So why are making things up that isn’t there?

  114. No moron. If he had a buyer at the time if the tweet who had agreed to buy at up to $420 a share, which is all he claimed, he’s in the clear. It id only any sport of fraud if he made that up.

    It doesn’t matter if other people with the power to stop the deal choose not to go for it.

  115. ” Looks like Tommy the NBF Musk Fluffer is about to eat crow. ” <-- About as soon as you can quote him retracting the deal in his 2nd tweet as you've claimed.

  116. Warren, you are the troll who under other names you’ve already admitted to, and denied at others, have edited people’s comment without their permission and boasted of the money you spent buying from SolidOpinion the power to do so. You’ve already admitted you’ve changed your name regularly, if I remember you claimed you did so every 6 months or so. I have nothing to do with Luca or Matteo, and you have no credibility on the matter, because you are the self admitted name changing troll.

    ” The SEC is now peeing in your Kool-Aid! ”

    So what? He proves he had a buyer at the time to get the company taken private at up to $420 a share, and he’s in the clear. It doesn’t matter if other shareholders reject the deal, or go for some other dollar value.

    You are the liar claiming he ever retracted anything, and of course you have yet to quote that.

    You made it up.

  119. Warren what is your deal with Musk. He literally does nothing company CEO’s don’t do all day long every day. I know I listen to them. He also has actually Delivered on a reusable launcher AND Tesla is getting better every year.

    So…..what is your obsession with the man. Because your starting to sound like that Oil company exec that got outed selling tesla short.

  120. Here is the thing, Musk called attention to the Media having no cloths. Stated he was going to make a sight where people could rate the media and Journalist. Sense then there have been nothing but bad stories about Musk.

    I am sure that’s just happenstance.

    The Media intends to tear Musk down till he is SJW compliant like the rest of the companies and rich. Then he is suddenly acceptable.

  121. Attention TommyLucatroll & all the other Fluffers For Musk:

    The SEC is now peeing in your Kool-Aid!

    Bloomberg) — The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is intensifying its scrutiny of Tesla Inc.’s public statements in the wake of Elon Musk’s provocative tweet Tuesday about taking the electric-car company private, according to two people familiar with the matter.

    SEC enforcement attorneys in the San Francisco office were already gathering general information about Tesla’s public pronouncements on manufacturing goals and sales targets, according to the people who asked not to be named because the review is private.

    Now, attorneys from that office are also examining whether Musk’s tweet about having funding secured to buy out the company was meant to be factual.

  128. Nope. Other way around. If what he says isn’t exactly true and proven to be so and the stock price is impacted by it, that’s securities fraud.

    SEC is now investigating. Poor Tommy the Musk Fluffer!

  129. From WSJ:

    SEC Probes Tesla CEO Musk’s Tweets
    The regulator is examining whether Musk’s statement was truthful and why the disclosure was made on Twitter.

    WASHINGTON—U.S. regulators are asking Tesla Inc. whether Chief Executive Elon Musk was truthful when he tweeted that he had secured funding for what would be the largest-ever corporate buyout, people familiar with the matter said.

    Looks like Tommy the NBF Musk Fluffer is about to eat crow.

  130. ” He goes to jail also if the Board doesn’t deliver exactly what he tweeted. ”

    No moron, if the vote goes against it, he’s fine. He is in no legal or moral jeopardy at all, unless there was no deal with the private capital buyer to take it private.

  131. So collapsing they are expanding with no prospect of their prospects dimming.

    The last quarter doesn’t even really matter, because not enough investors are as silly as you are — they know it’s the next decades which matter, and only Tesla is really going in the correct direction. Eventually, Ford, GM, et al will follow.

    But not yet.

  132. Yes it is stopping. It seems they will show a profit 3rd quarter, and given the likelihood of their continued expansion and dominance of the battery EV market, they will raise all the cash they need to for any more R&D and expansion.

    That’s the opposite of collapsing, you ignorant PoS.

  133. No moron, I’m just mocking your consistent stupidity with respect to all things Musk. You’ve claimed it’s obvious the USGov will take over SpaceX and you’ve claimed Tesla is headed for collapse, there is no trace of evidence for either. In fact, it all going the other way against you.

    The evidence the USGov will not nationalize SpaceX is, they have never done such a thing in the past and have no authority to do it either. We are not in wartime and even if we were, there is no evidence they would operate it better than Musk either (and quite the contrary).

    Tesla’s stock went quite against the trolls after even the most recent report, and the fundamentals of the company are excellent. They have a product they cannot satisfy the demand for yet, a product which iis already a better deal than its competition for easily 80% of the drivers in the country, and the sole reason they aren’t showing windfall profits is the pace of their expansion. They are a company 15 years old whose income has goner up 1000 fold in the last 10 years. The instant they don’t have to expand so aggressively, they become wildly profitably. People who don;t have such a stupidly shortsighted investment timeframe as you do want in. They want in at $420/share.

    You piss poor stupid troll.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, nec in esse nostro everti, erat illud mel an, mel ad aliquip vivendo legendos. Ius id fuisset luptatum, ex usu occurrence torquatos instructior, nobis omnes suscipit te sea. Vis at erat aperiri delicata, an phaedrum <-- Gobbledygook Vuukle asininely requires.

  136. He goes to jail also if the Board doesn’t deliver exactly what he tweeted. So, Musk Boy said $420/share. But if the Board votes for only say, $400, that’s as bad as if they didn’t vote on it at all, as far as the legal jeopardy Musk will be in.

    Strangely, if they vote for a higher amount he still might be in trouble…but most likely just a slap by the FEC in that case.

  138. Also, even if the board approves, it has to be for that $420/per share amount that Musk tweeted. If it isn’t…even if it is say, $400, then his tweets become fraudulent stock manipulation evidence just as if the board didn’t vote at all.

  140. ” Tesla collapse in 3 quarters at their current cash burn rate. ”

    Why pretend it stays there AND production doesn’t rise? Why would their increasing income trend stop?

    There’s no reason to think any of it will. Just pathological skepticism on your part.

  141. Tesla collapse in 3 quarters at their current cash burn rate.

    Sure they could go private or sell stock or up production to 20k cars a week or do something clever but they are hemorrhaging cash at a prodigious rate and it cannot continue.

    I for one hope that Elon takes the money and retires on the Moon/Mars and plays with his rockets the way a seven year old boy plays with toy trains.

  143. Yeah, I’m also concerned that the guy is spreading himself thin and maybe losing a marble or two.

    The whole Thai boys recue fiasco was an embarrassment he could have perfectly avoided.

    But this one can be his downfall, if he was just bluffing.

  145. “or Elon could be in trouble”

    If he hasn’t secured funding then he is going to jail. If he is manipulating the stock price through tweets then yeah game over. I sincerely hope (for Mr Musk and for SpaceX) that this isn’t the Ambien tweeting.

    For the most part I hope he gets his $15 billion payday and goes back to running just SpaceX. Tesla clearly has been a strain on him and with his newfound billions he can self fund the BFR/BFS and have enough left over for a trial Lunar colony.

Comments are closed.