Atlas Robot Can Do Parkour

Robotics company Boston Dynamics has a robot is hopping over a log and then up a series of blocks, an activity called parkour.

Boston Dynamics was sold by Alphabet to SoftBank last year.

This two-legged robot, called Atlas, is the same one that was shown doing a backflip less than a year ago.

110 thoughts on “Atlas Robot Can Do Parkour”

  1. That means they an stomp on piles of post-nuclear attack human skulls just laying on the ground, too! Hmmmm…did I see that in a movie somewhere? Trying to remember….

  2. That means they an stomp on piles of post-nuclear attack human skulls just laying on the ground too!Hmmmm…did I see that in a movie somewhere? Trying to remember….

  3. Aand that is a good reason in the abstract, to have a POAC firing system for a 40mm shaped charge grenade launcher with 20 rnds minimum. I need one for the car, one for the house.

  4. Aand that is a good reason in the abstract to have a POAC firing system for a 40mm shaped charge grenade launcher with 20 rnds minimum. I need one for the car one for the house.

  5. Makes you wonder if this is at, before or after an inflection point. Seems to be fairly close to matching a normal human’s agility (e.g. Diamond Ott’s), so it’d be interesting to see the failure modes and how independently it carries out these routines. How much or little guidance during and before it starts an obstacle course.

  6. It’s beginning to look like transformers there… They could probably generate a lot of income really soon by building and renting out prototypes to Hollywood studios. It looks like they will be able to compete with CGI almost already. Short scenes will not require a lot of battery performance.

  7. I wonder if their kinematic models allow it to blend requirements so it could for example menacingly hold a human head high in one hand while compensating for the balance changes to perform the same task.

  8. They should test it climbing down from a jeep – that seemed to be the most-failed test in the DARPA competition a while back.

  9. I’ve seen ther trendy tech dudes on sites making fun of this. Let me help imagine a NFL lineman catapulting up the stairs at you before he tears you in half. ROBOTS HAVE NOT MASTERED STAIRS….we are no longer safe,

  10. Makes you wonder if this is at before or after an inflection point. Seems to be fairly close to matching a normal human’s agility (e.g. Diamond Ott’s) so it’d be interesting to see the failure modes and how independently it carries out these routines. How much or little guidance during and before it starts an obstacle course.

  11. It’s beginning to look like transformers there…They could probably generate a lot of income really soon by building and renting out prototypes to Hollywood studios. It looks like they will be able to compete with CGI almost already. Short scenes will not require a lot of battery performance.

  12. I wonder if their kinematic models allow it to blend requirements so it could for example menacingly hold a human head high in one hand while compensating for the balance changes to perform the same task.

  13. They should test it climbing down from a jeep – that seemed to be the most-failed test in the DARPA competition a while back.

  14. I’ve seen ther trendy tech dudes on sites making fun of this.Let me help imagine a NFL lineman catapulting up the stairs at you before he tears you in half.ROBOTS HAVE NOT MASTERED STAIRS….we are no longer safe

  15. I think there is a huge amount of programming to get it to perform each of the tasks they have achieved beyond the general. But it certainly is responding to the environment, and adjusting its actions by feedback from sensors. But it would take a good 10,000 such skills to be taught to perform at janitor/military grunt level. I am impressed with the speed. The robot seems to be doing things faster than a couple years back. I hope all the processing is done within the robot and not on some mainframe. We also usually only see the good run, while there maybe 100 fails to 1 success. I’d rather see its 10 best runs (with the current state of the software) than just the best run. I think that would better demonstrate its current level.

  16. I want to see a maximized efficiency reverse spinning back kick. I bet the robot will be able to kick 4x a human

  17. I think there is a huge amount of programming to get it to perform each of the tasks they have achieved beyond the general. But it certainly is responding to the environment and adjusting its actions by feedback from sensors. But it would take a good 10000 such skills to be taught to perform at janitor/military grunt level. I am impressed with the speed. The robot seems to be doing things faster than a couple years back. I hope all the processing is done within the robot and not on some mainframe.We also usually only see the good run while there maybe 100 fails to 1 success. I’d rather see its 10 best runs (with the current state of the software) than just the best run. I think that would better demonstrate its current level.

  18. I want to see a maximized efficiency reverse spinning back kick. I bet the robot will be able to kick 4x a human

  19. Artificial Intelligence has eyes and ears with all our smart devices now it is acquiring hands and legs. What could go wrong? I just hope the technology will be used for peaceful purposes.

  20. Artificial Intelligence has eyes and ears with all our smart devices now it is acquiring hands and legs. What could go wrong? I just hope the technology will be used for peaceful purposes.

  21. Your (deleted?) comment about the human hand is actually very true. A lot of stunt scenes are ok without hands, but hands definitely will make a substantial improvement to stunt robot application. … Really curious what that could mean for animatronics. Not just the obvious applications like e.g. Robocop 2 remake.

  22. Your (deleted?) comment about the human hand is actually very true. A lot of stunt scenes are ok without hands but hands definitely will make a substantial improvement to stunt robot application. … Really curious what that could mean for animatronics. Not just the obvious applications like e.g. Robocop 2 remake.

  23. Agreed. Can’t you see the soldier in that last section, the slow-motion leaping across blocks? With armor, and operating at much higher speeds, these will surely be the soldiers of tomorrow, as well the firefighters, paramedics and police.

  24. Agreed. Can’t you see the soldier in that last section the slow-motion leaping across blocks?With armor and operating at much higher speeds these will surely be the soldiers of tomorrowas well the firefighters paramedics and police.

  25. This was a programmed course. Not much more sophisticated than programming your robot vacuum cleaner, the exception being the balance control gyro software. It appears to be awesome because it “looks” like human movement. From a purely mechanical side, the bi-pedalness is not optimum. The robot can be pushed over quite easily (center of gravity is very high up) and it wouldn’t be able to get up on it’s own, or even try (not programmed to). It can’t compensate for uneven surfaces. I’ve had the pleasure of seeing it in action. I fully see why people are throwing money at it, but makes no sense to me. The gyro is the key to staying upright. But real human balance is far more sophisticated and uses all sorts of feedback systems working in tandem in real time. The gyro system is the core value and really doesn’t have “terminator” application, but meant for other programs.

  26. This was a programmed course. Not much more sophisticated than programming your robot vacuum cleaner the exception being the balance control gyro software. It appears to be awesome because it looks”” like human movement. From a purely mechanical side”” the bi-pedalness is not optimum. The robot can be pushed over quite easily (center of gravity is very high up) and it wouldn’t be able to get up on it’s own or even try (not programmed to). It can’t compensate for uneven surfaces. I’ve had the pleasure of seeing it in action. I fully see why people are throwing money at it”” but makes no sense to me. The gyro is the key to staying upright. But real human balance is far more sophisticated and uses all sorts of feedback systems working in tandem in real time. The gyro system is the core value and really doesn’t have “”””terminator”””” application”””” but meant for other programs.”””

  27. This was a programmed course. Not much more sophisticated than programming your robot vacuum cleaner, the exception being the balance control gyro software. It appears to be awesome because it “looks” like human movement. From a purely mechanical side, the bi-pedalness is not optimum. The robot can be pushed over quite easily (center of gravity is very high up) and it wouldn’t be able to get up on it’s own, or even try (not programmed to). It can’t compensate for uneven surfaces. I’ve had the pleasure of seeing it in action. I fully see why people are throwing money at it, but makes no sense to me. The gyro is the key to staying upright. But real human balance is far more sophisticated and uses all sorts of feedback systems working in tandem in real time. The gyro system is the core value and really doesn’t have “terminator” application, but meant for other programs.

  28. This was a programmed course. Not much more sophisticated than programming your robot vacuum cleaner the exception being the balance control gyro software. It appears to be awesome because it looks”” like human movement. From a purely mechanical side”” the bi-pedalness is not optimum. The robot can be pushed over quite easily (center of gravity is very high up) and it wouldn’t be able to get up on it’s own or even try (not programmed to). It can’t compensate for uneven surfaces. I’ve had the pleasure of seeing it in action. I fully see why people are throwing money at it”” but makes no sense to me. The gyro is the key to staying upright. But real human balance is far more sophisticated and uses all sorts of feedback systems working in tandem in real time. The gyro system is the core value and really doesn’t have “”””terminator”””” application”””” but meant for other programs.”””

  29. Agreed. Can’t you see the soldier in that last section, the slow-motion leaping across blocks? With armor, and operating at much higher speeds, these will surely be the soldiers of tomorrow, as well the firefighters, paramedics and police.

  30. Agreed. Can’t you see the soldier in that last section the slow-motion leaping across blocks?With armor and operating at much higher speeds these will surely be the soldiers of tomorrowas well the firefighters paramedics and police.

  31. This was a programmed course. Not much more sophisticated than programming your robot vacuum cleaner, the exception being the balance control gyro software. It appears to be awesome because it “looks” like human movement. From a purely mechanical side, the bi-pedalness is not optimum. The robot can be pushed over quite easily (center of gravity is very high up) and it wouldn’t be able to get up on it’s own, or even try (not programmed to). It can’t compensate for uneven surfaces. I’ve had the pleasure of seeing it in action. I fully see why people are throwing money at it, but makes no sense to me. The gyro is the key to staying upright. But real human balance is far more sophisticated and uses all sorts of feedback systems working in tandem in real time. The gyro system is the core value and really doesn’t have “terminator” application, but meant for other programs.

  32. Agreed. Can’t you see the soldier in that last section, the slow-motion leaping across blocks?
    With armor, and operating at much higher speeds, these will surely be the soldiers of tomorrow,
    as well the firefighters, paramedics and police.

  33. Your (deleted?) comment about the human hand is actually very true. A lot of stunt scenes are ok without hands, but hands definitely will make a substantial improvement to stunt robot application. … Really curious what that could mean for animatronics. Not just the obvious applications like e.g. Robocop 2 remake.

  34. Your (deleted?) comment about the human hand is actually very true. A lot of stunt scenes are ok without hands but hands definitely will make a substantial improvement to stunt robot application. … Really curious what that could mean for animatronics. Not just the obvious applications like e.g. Robocop 2 remake.

  35. Artificial Intelligence has eyes and ears with all our smart devices now it is acquiring hands and legs. What could go wrong? I just hope the technology will be used for peaceful purposes.

  36. Artificial Intelligence has eyes and ears with all our smart devices now it is acquiring hands and legs. What could go wrong? I just hope the technology will be used for peaceful purposes.

  37. Your (deleted?) comment about the human hand is actually very true. A lot of stunt scenes are ok without hands, but hands definitely will make a substantial improvement to stunt robot application.

    … Really curious what that could mean for animatronics. Not just the obvious applications like e.g. Robocop 2 remake.

  38. << The robot seems to be doing things faster than a couple years back. I hope all the processing is done within the robot and not on some mainframe. >>
    Exactly what I was thinking during the vid. Likewise the more comprehensive top-10-runs footage.

  39. I think there is a huge amount of programming to get it to perform each of the tasks they have achieved beyond the general. But it certainly is responding to the environment, and adjusting its actions by feedback from sensors. But it would take a good 10,000 such skills to be taught to perform at janitor/military grunt level. I am impressed with the speed. The robot seems to be doing things faster than a couple years back. I hope all the processing is done within the robot and not on some mainframe. We also usually only see the good run, while there maybe 100 fails to 1 success. I’d rather see its 10 best runs (with the current state of the software) than just the best run. I think that would better demonstrate its current level.

  40. I think there is a huge amount of programming to get it to perform each of the tasks they have achieved beyond the general. But it certainly is responding to the environment and adjusting its actions by feedback from sensors. But it would take a good 10000 such skills to be taught to perform at janitor/military grunt level. I am impressed with the speed. The robot seems to be doing things faster than a couple years back. I hope all the processing is done within the robot and not on some mainframe.We also usually only see the good run while there maybe 100 fails to 1 success. I’d rather see its 10 best runs (with the current state of the software) than just the best run. I think that would better demonstrate its current level.

  41. I want to see a maximized efficiency reverse spinning back kick. I bet the robot will be able to kick 4x a human

  42. I want to see a maximized efficiency reverse spinning back kick. I bet the robot will be able to kick 4x a human

  43. Artificial Intelligence has eyes and ears with all our smart devices now it is acquiring hands and legs. What could go wrong? I just hope the technology will be used for peaceful purposes.

  44. Makes you wonder if this is at, before or after an inflection point. Seems to be fairly close to matching a normal human’s agility (e.g. Diamond Ott’s), so it’d be interesting to see the failure modes and how independently it carries out these routines. How much or little guidance during and before it starts an obstacle course.

  45. Makes you wonder if this is at before or after an inflection point. Seems to be fairly close to matching a normal human’s agility (e.g. Diamond Ott’s) so it’d be interesting to see the failure modes and how independently it carries out these routines. How much or little guidance during and before it starts an obstacle course.

  46. It’s beginning to look like transformers there… They could probably generate a lot of income really soon by building and renting out prototypes to Hollywood studios. It looks like they will be able to compete with CGI almost already. Short scenes will not require a lot of battery performance.

  47. It’s beginning to look like transformers there…They could probably generate a lot of income really soon by building and renting out prototypes to Hollywood studios. It looks like they will be able to compete with CGI almost already. Short scenes will not require a lot of battery performance.

  48. I think there is a huge amount of programming to get it to perform each of the tasks they have achieved beyond the general. But it certainly is responding to the environment, and adjusting its actions by feedback from sensors. But it would take a good 10,000 such skills to be taught to perform at janitor/military grunt level. I am impressed with the speed. The robot seems to be doing things faster than a couple years back. I hope all the processing is done within the robot and not on some mainframe.

    We also usually only see the good run, while there maybe 100 fails to 1 success. I’d rather see its 10 best runs (with the current state of the software) than just the best run. I think that would better demonstrate its current level.

  49. I wonder if their kinematic models allow it to blend requirements so it could for example menacingly hold a human head high in one hand while compensating for the balance changes to perform the same task.

  50. I wonder if their kinematic models allow it to blend requirements so it could for example menacingly hold a human head high in one hand while compensating for the balance changes to perform the same task.

  51. They should test it climbing down from a jeep – that seemed to be the most-failed test in the DARPA competition a while back.

  52. They should test it climbing down from a jeep – that seemed to be the most-failed test in the DARPA competition a while back.

  53. I’ve seen ther trendy tech dudes on sites making fun of this. Let me help imagine a NFL lineman catapulting up the stairs at you before he tears you in half. ROBOTS HAVE NOT MASTERED STAIRS….we are no longer safe,

  54. I’ve seen ther trendy tech dudes on sites making fun of this.Let me help imagine a NFL lineman catapulting up the stairs at you before he tears you in half.ROBOTS HAVE NOT MASTERED STAIRS….we are no longer safe

  55. Aand that is a good reason in the abstract, to have a POAC firing system for a 40mm shaped charge grenade launcher with 20 rnds minimum. I need one for the car, one for the house.

  56. Aand that is a good reason in the abstract to have a POAC firing system for a 40mm shaped charge grenade launcher with 20 rnds minimum. I need one for the car one for the house.

  57. Makes you wonder if this is at, before or after an inflection point. Seems to be fairly close to matching a normal human’s agility (e.g. Diamond Ott’s), so it’d be interesting to see the failure modes and how independently it carries out these routines. How much or little guidance during and before it starts an obstacle course.

  58. It’s beginning to look like transformers there…

    They could probably generate a lot of income really soon by building and renting out prototypes to Hollywood studios. It looks like they will be able to compete with CGI almost already. Short scenes will not require a lot of battery performance.

  59. That means they an stomp on piles of post-nuclear attack human skulls just laying on the ground, too! Hmmmm…did I see that in a movie somewhere? Trying to remember….

  60. That means they an stomp on piles of post-nuclear attack human skulls just laying on the ground too!Hmmmm…did I see that in a movie somewhere? Trying to remember….

  61. I wonder if their kinematic models allow it to blend requirements so it could for example menacingly hold a human head high in one hand while compensating for the balance changes to perform the same task.

  62. I’ve seen ther trendy tech dudes on sites making fun of this.

    Let me help imagine a NFL lineman catapulting up the stairs at you before he tears you in half.

    ROBOTS HAVE NOT MASTERED STAIRS….we are no longer safe,

  63. Aand that is a good reason in the abstract, to have a POAC firing system for a 40mm shaped charge grenade launcher with 20 rnds minimum. I need one for the car, one for the house.

  64. That means they an stomp on piles of post-nuclear attack human skulls just laying on the ground, too!

    Hmmmm…did I see that in a movie somewhere? Trying to remember….

Comments are closed.