DARPA OFFSET looks to empower dismounted units by transforming how humans and autonomous swarms interact in dynamic and complex urban operations.
DARPA’s OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) envisions swarms of 250 collaborative autonomous systems providing critical insights to small ground military units in urban areas where vertical structures, tight spaces, and limited sight lines constrain communications and mobility. DARPA is soliciting proposals for its third swarm sprint, which will focus on the topics of human-swarm teaming and swarm tactics.
Swarm sprints allow for incorporation of emerging technology and new performers throughout the life of the program. Each of five core sprints focuses on one or more of the key OFFSET thrust – or topic – areas: swarm tactics, swarm autonomy, human-swarm teaming, virtual environment, and physical testbed. Each topic emphasizes slightly different perspectives, but ultimately aims to enable breakthroughs in swarm capabilities.
“What makes autonomous swarm research challenging and compelling is the rapid pace at which swarm technologies and associated capabilities are advancing,” says Timothy Chung, program manager in DARPA’s Tactical Technology Office (TTO). “OFFSET is designed around the idea of incorporating core swarm sprints at regular intervals.”
The first of two topic areas covered in the third sprint is human-swarm teaming, which refers to the design, development, and demonstration of novel frameworks to enhance how humans interact with autonomous swarms. This topic area recognizes and seeks to address the complexity of the swarm systems themselves, as well as the cognitive, physical, and contextual needs of human teammates or tacticians when conducting urban operations.
The third swarm sprint also seeks to increase the collection of swarm tactics found in the OFFSET swarm tactics exchange, a repository of tools and tactics – or approaches – sprinters can employ. Selected swarm sprinters will design and implement additional sophisticated swarm tactics employing a heterogeneous swarm of air and ground robots, and addressing the mission context of “conducting an urban raid” within four square city blocks over a mission duration of one-to-two hours.
Swarm sprinters in either topic area, whether for human-swarm teaming or advanced swarm tactics, will integrate their technologies into one or both of the OFFSET swarm systems architectures, and will have the chance to further develop and demonstrate their innovative solutions in relevant field tests to showcase breakthrough swarm capabilities in urban settings.
DARPA also has awarded contracts to the following organizations for the second Swarm Sprint:
Carnegie Mellon University
Corenova Technologies, Inc.
Cornell University
Heron Systems Inc.
Michigan Technological University
Siemens Corporation, Corporate Technology
University of Colorado, Boulder
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
This cohort of sprinters for the second swarm will leverage existing technologies or develop new ones leading to enhancements in swarm autonomy, highlighting enriched foundations in swarm primitives and/or swarm algorithms. These contributions to the overarching OFFSET swarm systems architectures will offer additional building blocks for novel capabilities that spotlight the potentially disruptive advantages of autonomous swarms for complex urban operations.
Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
Who would benefit more from this technology – Skynet or the Matrix?
Who would benefit more from this technology – Skynet or the Matrix?
DARPA’s OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) envisions swarms of 250 collaborative …. Who would actually “envision” a number like 250 when talking about swarms?? They must be so in-depth to come up with that number. Is there any proof that 250 is THE right swarm size? I think 257 is better though 237 is also a very good choice. It is ridiculous! And it reflects the high level of incompetence of those “envisioners” in charge. The whole article is a collection of senseless rubbish. Take any paragraph and/or sentence and try to make any logical sense of it I will send you a dollar.
DARPA’s OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) envisions swarms of 250 collaborative ….Who would actually envision”” a number like 250 when talking about swarms?? They must be so in-depth to come up with that number. Is there any proof that 250 is THE right swarm size? I think 257 is better though 237 is also a very good choice. It is ridiculous! And it reflects the high level of incompetence of those “”””envisioners”””” in charge. The whole article is a collection of senseless rubbish. Take any paragraph and/or sentence and try to make any logical sense of it I will send you a dollar.”””””””
Cylons
Cylons
This will be a major reorganization of the military as well: small units carrying swarms in backpacks or small vehicles will essentially have the capabilities of much larger units in terms of enablers (sensors) and support (long and short range weaponry). Much like Infantry regiments lost regimental artillery or separate machine gun companies throughout the 20th century, we may now see other capabilities like armour or artillery change in very fundamental ways to incorporate these capabilities, or to supplement Infantry with even more specialized support which is not enabled by swarms.
This will be a major reorganization of the military as well: small units carrying swarms in backpacks or small vehicles will essentially have the capabilities of much larger units in terms of enablers (sensors) and support (long and short range weaponry). Much like Infantry regiments lost regimental artillery or separate machine gun companies throughout the 20th century we may now see other capabilities like armour or artillery change in very fundamental ways to incorporate these capabilities or to supplement Infantry with even more specialized support which is not enabled by swarms.
This will be a major reorganization of the military as well: small units carrying swarms in backpacks or small vehicles will essentially have the capabilities of much larger units in terms of enablers (sensors) and support (long and short range weaponry). Much like Infantry regiments lost regimental artillery or separate machine gun companies throughout the 20th century, we may now see other capabilities like armour or artillery change in very fundamental ways to incorporate these capabilities, or to supplement Infantry with even more specialized support which is not enabled by swarms.
This will be a major reorganization of the military as well: small units carrying swarms in backpacks or small vehicles will essentially have the capabilities of much larger units in terms of enablers (sensors) and support (long and short range weaponry). Much like Infantry regiments lost regimental artillery or separate machine gun companies throughout the 20th century we may now see other capabilities like armour or artillery change in very fundamental ways to incorporate these capabilities or to supplement Infantry with even more specialized support which is not enabled by swarms.
This will be a major reorganization of the military as well: small units carrying swarms in backpacks or small vehicles will essentially have the capabilities of much larger units in terms of enablers (sensors) and support (long and short range weaponry). Much like Infantry regiments lost regimental artillery or separate machine gun companies throughout the 20th century, we may now see other capabilities like armour or artillery change in very fundamental ways to incorporate these capabilities, or to supplement Infantry with even more specialized support which is not enabled by swarms.
Cylons
Cylons
Cylons
DARPA’s OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) envisions swarms of 250 collaborative …. Who would actually “envision” a number like 250 when talking about swarms?? They must be so in-depth to come up with that number. Is there any proof that 250 is THE right swarm size? I think 257 is better though 237 is also a very good choice. It is ridiculous! And it reflects the high level of incompetence of those “envisioners” in charge. The whole article is a collection of senseless rubbish. Take any paragraph and/or sentence and try to make any logical sense of it I will send you a dollar.
DARPA’s OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) envisions swarms of 250 collaborative ….Who would actually envision”” a number like 250 when talking about swarms?? They must be so in-depth to come up with that number. Is there any proof that 250 is THE right swarm size? I think 257 is better though 237 is also a very good choice. It is ridiculous! And it reflects the high level of incompetence of those “”””envisioners”””” in charge. The whole article is a collection of senseless rubbish. Take any paragraph and/or sentence and try to make any logical sense of it I will send you a dollar.”””””””
Who would benefit more from this technology – Skynet or the Matrix?
Who would benefit more from this technology – Skynet or the Matrix?
DARPA’s OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) envisions swarms of 250 collaborative ….
Who would actually “envision” a number like 250 when talking about swarms??
They must be so in-depth to come up with that number. Is there any proof that 250 is THE right swarm size? I think 257 is better though 237 is also a very good choice.
It is ridiculous! And it reflects the high level of incompetence of those “envisioners” in charge.
The whole article is a collection of senseless rubbish. Take any paragraph and/or sentence and try to make any logical sense of it I will send you a dollar.
Who would benefit more from this technology – Skynet or the Matrix?