Doubling a laser’s power level halves the time it takes to burn out a given target at a given range. A 50-kilowatt laser should destroy low-end drones in less than a second and be able to stop incoming drones of swarms before they get through.
The Army is developing a 100 kW laser mounted on a larger Oshkosh FMTV truck with about 5 to 10 tons of payload capacity.
The 100-kilowatt laser trucks would be the second line of defense after the Strykers with 50-kilowatt lasers.
Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
https://www.armyrecognition.com/weapons_defence_industry_military_technology_uk/turkey_uses_laser_weapon_technology_to_shoot_down_chinese_uav_wing_loong_ii_in_libya.html
The Lynx sometimes resembles Panzer III.
Regarding the anti drone capability of lasers, I can’t help but think the same money spent on small caliber automatic cannon firing canister rounds would be more effective, and would be less susceptible to countermeasures like reflective finishes, or magnesium oxide smoke.
Comment on the Lynx. The armor along the length of the cannon barrel(but not attached to the barrel) is a brilliant way to protect the gun mount, and to a lesser degree the rest of the turret, from threats not too far off the line of fire. The gun mount has always been the weakest point in a tank’s forward armor. Unless the Lynx is covered in microwave absorbing material, all the right angles are going to give it a huge radar cross section.
The Lynx sometimes resembles Panzer III.
Regarding the anti drone capability of lasers I can’t help but think the same money spent on small caliber automatic cannon firing canister rounds would be more effective and would be less susceptible to countermeasures like reflective finishes or magnesium oxide smoke.
Comment on the Lynx. The armor along the length of the cannon barrel(but not attached to the barrel) is a brilliant way to protect the gun mount and to a lesser degree the rest of the turret from threats not too far off the line of fire. The gun mount has always been the weakest point in a tank’s forward armor.Unless the Lynx is covered in microwave absorbing material all the right angles are going to give it a huge radar cross section.
Good point, those countermeasures you listed would indeed degrade the laser system’s effectiveness. However, I would contend that reflective finishes aren’t all their chalked up to be unless cleaned every other minute; any spec of dirt or dust would lead to a decrease in reflective performance, which would lead to more non-reflective spots forming as the energy absorbed by the dust/dirt degrades its immediate vicinity. A laser system has other attractive strengths, too: a very deep magazine being determined by power availability, effective range is much higher, and the ability to take out faster moving targets such as mortars, artillery shells, missiles, etc. Additionally, the laser system uses advanced optics to make it possible, and those optics can double as a visual aid in heightening situational awareness on the battlefield. In the end, as it the mostly cop out compromise it is, “why not both”?
Good point those countermeasures you listed would indeed degrade the laser system’s effectiveness. However I would contend that reflective finishes aren’t all their chalked up to be unless cleaned every other minute; any spec of dirt or dust would lead to a decrease in reflective performance which would lead to more non-reflective spots forming as the energy absorbed by the dust/dirt degrades its immediate vicinity. A laser system has other attractive strengths too: a very deep magazine being determined by power availability effective range is much higher and the ability to take out faster moving targets such as mortars artillery shells missiles etc. Additionally the laser system uses advanced optics to make it possible and those optics can double as a visual aid in heightening situational awareness on the battlefield. In the end as it the mostly cop out compromise it is why not both””?”””
I bet by 2075 we’ll have 100 kw laser rifles
I bet by 2075 we’ll have 100 kw laser rifles
World militaries have been developing laser weapons for 30-40 years. Bullets and rockets will be around for decades more.
World militaries have been developing laser weapons for 30-40 years. Bullets and rockets will be around for decades more.
If we have those you’ll see powered armor functioning right along with it.
If we have those you’ll see powered armor functioning right along with it.
Dirt on reflective surfaces would just vaporize under say 100kw of laser light. Really just go with ceramic armor or some magic metal that can transfer heat incredibly well. We are a very long way away from a laser that can take out a main battle tank.
Powered armor well before 100kw laser rifles.
Dirt on reflective surfaces would just vaporize under say 100kw of laser light.Really just go with ceramic armor or some magic metal that can transfer heat incredibly well.We are a very long way away from a laser that can take out a main battle tank.
Powered armor well before 100kw laser rifles.
Dirt on reflective surfaces would just vaporize under say 100kw of laser light. Really just go with ceramic armor or some magic metal that can transfer heat incredibly well. We are a very long way away from a laser that can take out a main battle tank.
Dirt on reflective surfaces would just vaporize under say 100kw of laser light.Really just go with ceramic armor or some magic metal that can transfer heat incredibly well.We are a very long way away from a laser that can take out a main battle tank.
Powered armor well before 100kw laser rifles.
Powered armor well before 100kw laser rifles.
Dirt on reflective surfaces would just vaporize under say 100kw of laser light.
Really just go with ceramic armor or some magic metal that can transfer heat incredibly well.
We are a very long way away from a laser that can take out a main battle tank.
Powered armor well before 100kw laser rifles.
If we have those you’ll see powered armor functioning right along with it.
If we have those you’ll see powered armor functioning right along with it.
If we have those you’ll see powered armor functioning right along with it.
World militaries have been developing laser weapons for 30-40 years. Bullets and rockets will be around for decades more.
World militaries have been developing laser weapons for 30-40 years. Bullets and rockets will be around for decades more.
World militaries have been developing laser weapons for 30-40 years. Bullets and rockets will be around for decades more.
I bet by 2075 we’ll have 100 kw laser rifles
I bet by 2075 we’ll have 100 kw laser rifles
Good point, those countermeasures you listed would indeed degrade the laser system’s effectiveness. However, I would contend that reflective finishes aren’t all their chalked up to be unless cleaned every other minute; any spec of dirt or dust would lead to a decrease in reflective performance, which would lead to more non-reflective spots forming as the energy absorbed by the dust/dirt degrades its immediate vicinity. A laser system has other attractive strengths, too: a very deep magazine being determined by power availability, effective range is much higher, and the ability to take out faster moving targets such as mortars, artillery shells, missiles, etc. Additionally, the laser system uses advanced optics to make it possible, and those optics can double as a visual aid in heightening situational awareness on the battlefield. In the end, as it the mostly cop out compromise it is, “why not both”?
Good point those countermeasures you listed would indeed degrade the laser system’s effectiveness. However I would contend that reflective finishes aren’t all their chalked up to be unless cleaned every other minute; any spec of dirt or dust would lead to a decrease in reflective performance which would lead to more non-reflective spots forming as the energy absorbed by the dust/dirt degrades its immediate vicinity. A laser system has other attractive strengths too: a very deep magazine being determined by power availability effective range is much higher and the ability to take out faster moving targets such as mortars artillery shells missiles etc. Additionally the laser system uses advanced optics to make it possible and those optics can double as a visual aid in heightening situational awareness on the battlefield. In the end as it the mostly cop out compromise it is why not both””?”””
The Lynx sometimes resembles Panzer III.
The Lynx sometimes resembles Panzer III.
Regarding the anti drone capability of lasers, I can’t help but think the same money spent on small caliber automatic cannon firing canister rounds would be more effective, and would be less susceptible to countermeasures like reflective finishes, or magnesium oxide smoke.
Regarding the anti drone capability of lasers I can’t help but think the same money spent on small caliber automatic cannon firing canister rounds would be more effective and would be less susceptible to countermeasures like reflective finishes or magnesium oxide smoke.
Comment on the Lynx. The armor along the length of the cannon barrel(but not attached to the barrel) is a brilliant way to protect the gun mount, and to a lesser degree the rest of the turret, from threats not too far off the line of fire. The gun mount has always been the weakest point in a tank’s forward armor. Unless the Lynx is covered in microwave absorbing material, all the right angles are going to give it a huge radar cross section.
Comment on the Lynx. The armor along the length of the cannon barrel(but not attached to the barrel) is a brilliant way to protect the gun mount and to a lesser degree the rest of the turret from threats not too far off the line of fire. The gun mount has always been the weakest point in a tank’s forward armor.Unless the Lynx is covered in microwave absorbing material all the right angles are going to give it a huge radar cross section.
I bet by 2075 we’ll have 100 kw laser rifles
Good point, those countermeasures you listed would indeed degrade the laser system’s effectiveness. However, I would contend that reflective finishes aren’t all their chalked up to be unless cleaned every other minute; any spec of dirt or dust would lead to a decrease in reflective performance, which would lead to more non-reflective spots forming as the energy absorbed by the dust/dirt degrades its immediate vicinity.
A laser system has other attractive strengths, too: a very deep magazine being determined by power availability, effective range is much higher, and the ability to take out faster moving targets such as mortars, artillery shells, missiles, etc. Additionally, the laser system uses advanced optics to make it possible, and those optics can double as a visual aid in heightening situational awareness on the battlefield.
In the end, as it the mostly cop out compromise it is, “why not both”?
The Lynx sometimes resembles Panzer III.
Regarding the anti drone capability of lasers, I can’t help but think the same money spent on small caliber automatic cannon firing canister rounds would be more effective, and would be less susceptible to countermeasures like reflective finishes, or magnesium oxide smoke.
Comment on the Lynx. The armor along the length of the cannon barrel(but not attached to the barrel) is a brilliant way to protect the gun mount, and to a lesser degree the rest of the turret, from threats not too far off the line of fire. The gun mount has always been the weakest point in a tank’s forward armor.
Unless the Lynx is covered in microwave absorbing material, all the right angles are going to give it a huge radar cross section.