Above – A sketch of the future Circular Electron Positron Collider. (Photo/Courtesy of Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of High Energy Physics)
“The collider will have a circumference of 100 kilometers, with a center-mass energy up to 240 giga electron-volts both setting a world record,” Wang said. The collider should produce more Higgs boson particles, the essential, inevitable quarry of modern particle physics, He noted.
The conceptual design for the Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC) passed international examinations in September, Wang said.
The collider will provide light at a million electron-volt power level, creating the most advanced conditions for research on new materials and nuclear physics.
Scientists from the U.S., Europe and Japan have participated in designing the project, will work on the building process and conduct research with the collider.
In a bid to maximize the project’s service life, scientists are mulling upgrading the electron positron collider around 2040 into a proton collider.
By then, the center-mass energy for the CEPC will have reached about 100 tera electron-volts, seven times as powerful as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland.
The Large Hadron Collider is being upgraded to 14 TeV collision energy in 2018.
Timeline of the Circular Electron Positron Collider
Engineering Design: 2015-2020
Construction: 2021-2027
Data taking: 2028-2035
Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
But individual electrons are destroyed fairly regularly. Whenever someone makes a positron for example.
On the other hand, beta emission nuclear decay produces electrons.
The only discovery will be the solution to Femi’s paradox.
D’Oh!
There goes the interdimensional barrier. Now we will get the monsters from the other side.
Do not waste your time with that loserh throll
He is not smarter than WTA (same IQ of about 80, I assume, at leaast WTA is funnier to read)
Regards Luca Mazza
Lots of cow pus usually ends up in the steaks you are eating. Have a nice dinner loserh
Ah and welcome to my ignore list (from now on) Bye loserh
You mean Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are choumps?
What an idhiot you are..
Do you consider chess to be a board game???
You say this as you lost at Monopoly as well
Spolied kid as I was sayin..
At least it puts the 1 electron theory to the test table : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe
If 1 electron can move forward and backward in time, we would need only 1 to exist.
And if it got destroyed then the universe ends, as all matter would collapse as matter would no longer be separated by electromagnetic force once our single electron is gone.
So, about 20% bigger than the cancelled Superconducting Supercollider project, and perhaps not using superconducting magnets, but designs derivative from the LHC magnets perhaps then? With a huge tunnel/TBM industry within china, getting the tunnels dug should be vastly cheaper.
I hate Monopoly. Soooo boring. Never was able to get through an hour of it.
You remember me of those little spoiled kids that love to play Monopoli when they are winning and then a nother kid wins and they say, oh I o do not like Monopoli anymore
Losers
If you ask me
The text is mentioning “upgrading the collider to protons…”
Why is that considered an upgrade then ?
You mean the secrets of the universe aren’t ancient Chinese secrets?
Nah, it’s actually pretty useful from a physics perspective, because electrons aren’t composite particles. It simplifies interpreting results. Also, because they have a very high charge to mass ratio, they’re easier to bend into a circle while going fast. So I’d say it’s the right choice.
But individual electrons are destroyed fairly regularly. Whenever someone makes a positron for example.
On the other hand, beta emission nuclear decay produces electrons.
The only discovery will be the solution to Femi’s paradox.
D’Oh!
There goes the interdimensional barrier. Now we will get the monsters from the other side.
Do not waste your time with that loserh throll
He is not smarter than WTA (same IQ of about 80, I assume, at leaast WTA is funnier to read)
Regards Luca Mazza
Lots of cow pus usually ends up in the steaks you are eating. Have a nice dinner loserh
Ah and welcome to my ignore list (from now on) Bye loserh
You mean Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are choumps?
What an idhiot you are..
Do you consider chess to be a board game???
You say this as you lost at Monopoly as well
Spolied kid as I was sayin..
At least it puts the 1 electron theory to the test table : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe
If 1 electron can move forward and backward in time, we would need only 1 to exist.
And if it got destroyed then the universe ends, as all matter would collapse as matter would no longer be separated by electromagnetic force once our single electron is gone.
So, about 20% bigger than the cancelled Superconducting Supercollider project, and perhaps not using superconducting magnets, but designs derivative from the LHC magnets perhaps then? With a huge tunnel/TBM industry within china, getting the tunnels dug should be vastly cheaper.
I hate Monopoly. Soooo boring. Never was able to get through an hour of it.
You remember me of those little spoiled kids that love to play Monopoli when they are winning and then a nother kid wins and they say, oh I o do not like Monopoli anymore
Losers
If you ask me
The text is mentioning “upgrading the collider to protons…”
Why is that considered an upgrade then ?
You mean the secrets of the universe aren’t ancient Chinese secrets?
Nah, it’s actually pretty useful from a physics perspective, because electrons aren’t composite particles. It simplifies interpreting results. Also, because they have a very high charge to mass ratio, they’re easier to bend into a circle while going fast. So I’d say it’s the right choice.