Here is a high-resolution picture of the IonQ ion trap (image credit is Kai Hudek). The ion qubits are suspended electromagnetically in the center above the thin slot you see in the middle of the bow tie. Control lasers pass across and above the surface of the chip perpendicular to the slot.
Yesterday, IonQ announced that they had the most powerful quantum computers in the world. They announced a 79 qubit trapped ion processor and a system with 160 qubit storage.
The IonQ Website is here https://ionq.co/
The Q2B conference website is at this link and was organized by QCware.
Highlights From the Nextbigfuture Interview with Stewart Allen
* IonQ systems are at room temperature
* IonQ manipulates ions with magnets and lasers and have software control on mostly FPGA chips
* IonQ are like atomic clocks, they do not have time limiting decoherence
* IonQ can invent and make any kind of quantum gate. It is a matter of software and tuning laser pulses.
* There are no idle errors, no readout errors and no qubit lifetime problem
Email Answer From IonQ About Fully Connected Qubits and Connectivity Tests
There is a reference on the IonQ webpage about 11-qubits being fully connected. This refers to a full connectivity test that they ran on one of their systems. In that particular test there were 13 qubits loaded. For technical reasons, they chose to use the center 11. The proof is, in the most basic terms, to test all pairs a large number of times. They then used that setup to run the BV-11 test that they showed the data for.
IonQ confirmed my observation of test scaling. The combinations of two-qubit interactions rises with the qubit count. That means the minimum required gate count for full entanglement rises roughly as a square (n*n, not 2^n) of the number of qubits. Here is a link to an online calculator for combinations.
Doing this connectivity test alone is insufficient to express the power of a quantum system; gate depth (count) and fidelity are also critical. However, they consider it a baseline for useful qubit count in a quantum system. Power and performance are topics that will be hotly debated for a long time as each algorithm will have different requirements. As with PC benchmarks, they suspect a suite of common algorithms and tests will emerge over time that will allow vendors to better provide side-by-side comparisons.
Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
5 thoughts on “Image of the IonQ Ion Trap Chip”
Obligatory quarter for scale.
They’re in a race with MIT’s Lincoln Lab (who also has a chip just like this) so probably they’re going to skip the proof if it slows them down.
It would be nice to have something indicating the physical size of the item in pictures like the one at the top of the article. Is it a cm across? mm? micrometer?
So what are they going to do with it to demonstrate that it works?
More details of the design may be available here:
United States Patent Application 20180114138
MONROE; Christopher ; et al. April 26, 2018
FAULT-TOLERANT SCALABLE MODULAR QUANTUM COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE WITH AN ENHANCED CONTROL OF MULTI-MODE COUPLINGS BETWEEN TRAPPED ION QUBITS
United States Patent Application 20180286648
Monroe; Christopher ; et al. October 4, 2018
ACTIVE STABILIZATION OF ION TRAP RADIO FREQUENCY POTENTIALS
For an indepth read.
Comments are closed.