Late in 2019, engineers at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama tested NASA’s Space Launch System liquid hydrogen test article tank to failure. The tank withstood more than 260% of expected flight loads before buckling and rupturing. The test version of the tank aced earlier tests, withstanding forces expected at engine thrust levels planned for Artemis lunar missions, showing no signs of cracks, buckling or breaking. The test on Dec. 5 — conducted using a combination of gaseous nitrogen for pressurization and hydraulics for loads — pushed the tank to the limits by exposing it to higher forces that caused it to break as engineers predicted. Earlier tests at Marshall certified the tank for both the current version of the SLS — called Block 1, which will use an upper stage called the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage — and the Block 1B version that will replace the ICPS with the more powerful Exploration Upper Stage.
SOURCES: NASA
Written by Brian Wang, Nextbigfuture.com
Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
Interesting to note that neither SLS tank failure occurred at a weld joint, like all the Starship tank test failures have, so far. A properly engineered and manufactured welded pressurized structure should never fail at a weld joint.
I’m looking forward to it flying myself.
Ideally yes, but filling with water and nitrogen gas is usually a decent substitute if you are short hardware articles you can destroy/scrap…
Shouldn’t you test a cryogenics tank with cryogenic fluid? Asking for a friend…
Everything’s on schedule then.
I mean, if what you’re looking for is to continue with the jobs program.
There’s a joke in there if you dig for it.
Well, it wasn’t bacon, but most certainly PORK.
When it popped did the bacon grease pour out?
SLS fails at 1 Bar.
(its a joke)
how many bar before sls tank fails? (Just for comparison to space starship.)
Cool. Now it’s another 10 years until they build another one.