Aerographite Released Near the Sun Accelerate to Over 2% of Lightspeed

Aerographite exists as seen in the petri dish from over two years ago. It is 15000 times lighter than aluminum and making 1 micron pellets and releasing them from where we have already sent the Parker solar mission near the sun they would reach over 2% of lightspeed.

A steady stream of these small pellets can be used by plasma magnet propulsion systems to accelerate to 6% of lightspeed. NOTE: the pellets will need to be created with some means of identifying the exact location of the stream. A laser could fired down the stream path. There could be other highly detectable elements in it. This way it will be easier for the plasma magnet vehicle to cross and start interacting with the stream far out into and even out of the solar system.

At 20% the speed of light, a ~0.5 micron diameter particle at twice the density of water will impart 7.2 Joules of energy or about as much as energy as it takes to raise a 5 pound (~2.3 kg) weight from the ground to over your head. A 1 micron Aerogrphite pellet at 2% of lightspeed would have far less energy as it is 15000 times lighter than aluminum. Each micron aerographite pellet at 2% of lightspeed would have about 0.5 millijoules. It is the stream of billions of them that enable a three body interaction that enables the dynamic soaring effects to raise the speed.

Big Think reviews the issue of particles in space.

Teams at the Technical University of Hamburg and the University of Kiel developed aerographite, they dubbed it “the lightest known material.” It is a synthetic foam connected by carbon microtubes with a density of 180 g/m3.

Centauri Dreams described this work.

Aerographite’s opacity is important because we are talking about a sail that functions not through reflectivity but absorptivity. The space sail concepts usually revolved around reflection.

1 μm (micron) thin aerographite hollow sphere at 0.04 AU (this is Parker Solar Probe territory) for a close solar pass and you achieve 6900 km/second.

The solar photon pressure provides a viable source of thrust for spacecraft in the solar system. Theoretically it could also enable
interstellar missions, but an extremely small mass per cross section area is required to overcome the solar gravity. Aerographite, a synthetic carbon-based foam is 15,000 times more lightweight than aluminum) as a versatile material for highly efficient propulsion with sunlight. A hollow aerographite sphere with a shell thickness shl = 1 mm could go interstellar upon submission to solar radiation in interplanetary space. Upon launch at 1 AU from the Sun, an aerographite shell with shl = 0.5 mm arrives at the orbit of Mars in 60 d and at Pluto’s orbit in 4.3 yr. Release of an aerographite hollow sphere, whose shell is 1 µm thick, at 0.04 AU (the closest approach of the Parker Solar Probe) results in an escape speed of nearly 6900 km per second (over 2% of lightspeed) and 185 yr of travel to the distance of our nearest star, Proxima Centauri. The infrared signature of a meter-sized aerographite sail could be observed with JWST up to 2 AU from the Sun, beyond the orbit of Mars. An aerographite hollow sphere, whose shell is 100 µm thick, of 1 m (5 m) radius weighs 230 mg (5.7 g) and has a 2.2 g (55 g) mass margin to allow interstellar escape. The payload margin is ten times the mass of the spacecraft, whereas the payload on chemical interstellar rockets is typically a thousandth of the weight of the rocket. Using 1 g (10 g) of this margin (e.g., for miniature communication technology with Earth), it would reach the orbit of Pluto 4.7 yr (2.8 yr) after interplanetary launch at 1 AU. Simplistic communication would enable studies of the interplanetary medium and a search for the suspected Planet Nine, and would serve as a precursor mission to αCentauri. Prototype developments costs of 1 million USD, a price of 1000 USD per sail, and a total of < 10 million USD including launch for a piggyback concept with an interplanetary mission. Arxiv – Low-cost precursor of an interstellar mission by René Heller, Guillem Anglada-Escudé, Michael Hippke, and Pierre Kervella

Aerographite Pellet Sailing Propulsion

Jeff Greason describes how to go from 2% of lightspeed using dynamic solar wind soaring and then using pellets propelled from the sun to go from 2-6% of lightspeed using existing near term technology. At 6% of lightspeed the particles in the interstellar medium interact with the spacecraft like beyond nuclear fusion level energy. The high intensity energy is taken and used to power propulsion to reach 25% of lightspeed. The plasma magnet used during the solar wind dynamic soaring phase is used to brake at the target star.

These are clever ways to take relatively near-term technologies to reach 25% of lightspeed with probes and possibly even manned spacecraft. The methods to get to 2% of lightspeed over 2 years are all that are needed for travel within the solar system and even out to the gravitational lens points starting about a dozen times further than Pluto. Going to the gravitational lens areas let a small telescope use the Sun as a lens to become 10 billions time more powerful. We can pre-explore all of the solar systems within 1000s of light years with millions of space telescopes. We then choose to send actual probes to the best solar systems which we will have already started exploring with observatories sent to viewing points 3 light days around the Sun.

Gaining the kinetic energy required for interstellar flight affordably is difficult and tapping existing natural sources of energy such as the solar wind is attractive for reducing costs. However, a gap exists in the published concepts, in that solar wind speeds are limited to ~700 km/s, while even with concepts such as the wind-powered reaction drive (‘q’-drive), speeds of ~5% of c must be reached before they can take over. A cost effective way to fill that gap has been lacking.

Aerographite puffballs can be released near the sun and they will accelerate to about 5% of light speed. Aerographite is ultra-thin foam and are 15,000 times lighter than aluminum.

Objective – Demonstrate a method by which inert pellets, accelerated by the solar wind, can be used to accelerate a spacecraft from solar wind speeds up to ~5% of c.

Methods: Classical physics computations to support the basic physics and feasibility of the approach.

Results: When two matter streams are in proximity but with different velocities, or when they move through the same space but with different velocities and distinguishable properties, the difference in velocities, or velocity shear, can be used to gain propulsive energy. A stream of pellets moving through the interstellar medium is an example of such a case. Propulsion by pellets is an idea explored in the prior art that requires high speed pellets; the extraction of useful work from the difference in speed between the pellets and the interstellar medium allows a ship running over the pellets and also drawing energy from the passage through the interstellar medium to gain propulsive energy even when faster than the pellets and even when the pellets are composed of inert reaction mass. The basic physics of this is discussed and the performance equations and discuss this in the context of using relatively slow pellets (accelerated by solar wind), to send a spacecraft to a substantial multiple over the solar wind velocity. Another case where small macroparticles and a plasma wind are at different speeds is the inner solar system in the plane of the ecliptic, where the solar wind and zodiacal dust have different velocity distributions; this may offer further applications of the same principle.

Arxiv – Low-cost precursor of an interstellar mission

The solar photon pressure provides a viable source of thrust for spacecraft in the solar system. Theoretically it could also enable interstellar missions, but an extremely small mass per cross section area is required to overcome the solar gravity. We identify aerographite, a synthetic carbon-based foam with a density of 0.18 kg m−3 (15,000 times more lightweight than aluminum) as a versatile material for highly efficient propulsion with sunlight. A hollow aerographite sphere with a shell thickness shl = 1 mm could go interstellar upon submission to solar radiation in interplanetary space. Upon launch at 1 AU from the Sun, an aerographite shell with shl = 0.5 mm arrives at the orbit of Mars in 60 d and at Pluto’s orbit in 4.3 yr. Release of an aerographite hollow sphere, whose shell is 1 µm thick, at 0.04 AU (the closest approach of the Parker Solar Probe) results in an escape speed of nearly 6900 km s−1 and 185 yr of travel to the distance of our nearest star, Proxima Centauri. The infrared signature of a meter-sized aerographite sail could be observed with JWST up to 2 AU from the Sun, beyond the orbit of Mars. An aerographite hollow sphere, whose shell is 100 µm thick, of 1 m (5 m) radius weighs 230 mg (5.7 g) and has a 2.2 g (55 g) mass margin to allow interstellar escape. The payload margin is ten times the mass of the spacecraft, whereas the payload on chemical interstellar rockets is typically a thousandth of the weight of the rocket. Using 1 g (10 g) of this margin (e.g., for miniature communication technology with Earth), it would reach the orbit of Pluto 4.7 yr (2.8 yr) after interplanetary launch at 1 AU. Simplistic communication would enable studies of the interplanetary medium and a search for the suspected Planet Nine, and would serve as a precursor mission to αCentauri. We estimate prototype developments costs of 1 million USD, a price of 1000 USD per sail, and a total of < 10 million USD including launch for a piggyback concept with an interplanetary mission.

A technology developed under NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) sponsorship, the Plasma Magnet, offers a path to high-acceleration maneuvers in the solar wind, including fast transits to outer planets and to the Solar Gravitational Lens.

The AIAA Nuclear and Future Flight Propulsion Technical Committee has sponsored a conceptual design study of a demonstrator mission, JOVE. If flown, JOVE would provide the critical flight demonstration of this technology. The solar-powered spacecraft would weigh approximately 25 kilograms and would get to Jupiter in three weeks reaching an astounding 300 kilometers per second. Mr. Greason went over the key design challenges uncovered during the conceptual design, reviewed the current state, and discussed possible next steps.

Jeff Greason is an entrepreneur and innovator with 25 years of experience in the commercial space industry. He is the Chief Technologist of Electric Sky, developing long-range wireless power for propulsion and other purposes; and Chairman of the Tau Zero Foundation, developing advanced propulsion technologies for solar system and interstellar missions. He has been active in the development of commercial space regulation and served on the Presidential Augustine Commission in 2009. Jeff was a co-founder of XCOR Aerospace and served as CEO from 1999 to early 2015. Previously, he was the rocket engine team lead at Rotary Rocket and an engineering manager in chip technology development at Intel. He holds 28 U.S. patents and has recently published papers on novel space propulsion concepts. He is also a Governor of the National Space Society.

24 thoughts on “Aerographite Released Near the Sun Accelerate to Over 2% of Lightspeed”

  1. Blackbird sailing vehicle

    Give it a ‘Chinese’, ‘Greek’, ‘Persian’ or (less historically said) vertical turbine wind energy converter (diameter surrounding the vehicle’s wheels chassis/drivers cabin; lower efficiency than horizontal wind turbine, but direction independent for ‘beyond’ style, like the SR–71 from 1960’s is beyond ‘legendary’)?

  2. our generations/century

    It’s about sending/receiving information not mass?

    What particles are spread within our closer interstellar space, dense enough, for harvesting during flights?

    What Communication (information exchange) concepts are faster than light (quantum entanglement)?

  3. Mr Physics here … AKA GoatGuy

    The whole point is that the things accelerated by Sol’s light flux must either be opaque to most of the radiation, or better — but not required — reflective of it. And any combo between those two. This is what the little η is in the tables above, the functional coefficient of photon flux propulsive utilization. Ranging from 0 (‘useless’) to 1 (absorptive) to 2 (perfectly retro-reflective). Even a white surface at say 100% reflectance doesn’t deliver an η of 2.0, but somewhat less given that its back reflection is nearly homogeneous around a half sphere.

    This plays into Brett’s comment about opacity. The objects (“pellets”) must be opaque and black … or nearly so, to enjoy the full ‘1’ η acceleration of Sol’s energies.

    Moreover, it doesn’t take too much numeric modeling to show that ‘puff balls’ (hollow spheres or pancakes of aero-graphite foam) are a useful abstraction of things that can get going and not need their own azimuth ‘fiddling’ along the trip. Even as they rotate about their axes, from Sol’s perspective, they more or less remain opaque circles. (very modest intentional asymmetries would also serve as ultra-low mass vectoring mechanisms)

    Aside from that, I find the proposition of sending 250 tons of nano-graphite to 0.4AU … to hang around as a ‘statite’, vectoring about in order to release a nearly endless stream of whiff-think, milligram-level puff-balls … in a coherent stream, to allow an equally (nearly) massive interstellar probe to catch ’em, and gain an appreciable fraction of ‘c’ in return, to be somewhat dubious at best. Basically, giving all of the billions of them individual vectoring commands and measuring their progress to make for a coherent beam seems pretty far fetched.

    Not science fiction.
    Just far fetched.

    ON THE UPSIDE … at least my little afternoon-with-mathematics-to-see-if-they’re-smoking-something determined that their graphics and tables are competent, based however on assumptions that may well not turn out to be viable.

    LASTLY … do also beware of the Universal Magic Wand in play. That part about T+26.3 years, ‘start braking’. That is a big, strong, sparky magic wand. Were I sitting in the lecture, I’d have raised my hand and asked, “and what mechanism of braking is actually envisioned?”

    Keep all that in mind.

    Just saying…

    • Ah, for want of EDITING of comments.
      0.04 AU instead of 0.4 AU.
      ε instead of η
      and probably a half dozen more

    • As for the vectoring, if you release a stream of them, I suppose you can release a stream of “focusing” stations riding the stream out. They could be propelled along by the fringe of the stream, and actively correct the trajectories.

    • That’s a pretty interesting paper. Seems they are closing into the fabled lighter than air solid.

      That is a potential revolution for various domains. For example, eventually allowing the creation of permanent, sunlight powered drones, to be used in a domestic setting (e.g. surveillance and carrying stuff around) and for things like atmospheric satellites.

      Rain and wind still are a problem for airships of any size, limiting what can de done in the lower atmosphere. But such a problem doesn’t exist or is less in the stratosphere.

      Floating solid bricks could be used to build and lift objects of arbitrary size, including platforms for permanent loitering and habitation. Namely floating homes and buildings, depending on how cheap these materials can get.

      Also, making JP Aerospace’s dark sky stations and orbital rockoons would be far easier if the building material was solid.

      • “Floating solid bricks ” and the most memorable phrase from Hitchhiker’s Guide the Galaxy becomes as anachronistic as those 1950s SF stories with FTL travel but needing a slide rule to calculate the trajectories.

      • Alas, while you can easily make aerogels that are lighter than air if the air inside the pores is removed, they’re not nearly strong enough to support the resulting air pressure on their exteriors for any significant size of block.

        You might be able to make pellets of some useable size that would be lighter than air, and use them as a filler; Supporting the load gets easier as the block gets smaller. I’d have to run the numbers.

  4. I think a bigger short term revolution is coming from similar materials: that of lighter than air vacuum-containing aerographites and aerogels.

    There already are works published describing the near term production of such materials, and even patents of the kind of lighter than air airships they make possible.

    Imagine what we could do with long term floating, solid construction materials, removing the problem of running our of helium and the danger of free molecular hydrogen.

    We could conquest the stratosphere!

    A domain as big as the planet, tens of kilometers tall and still fully protected from space radiation.

    https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1824040

  5. Personally, I still think that the earlier plan of using dynamic soaring on the solar wind itself is probably better; placing anything at the Parker Solar Probe’s closest approach is a multi-year effort for generating a tiny particle stream we may end up missing altogether…

    • Just dynamic soaring to 2% of light speed would be great. Using the power from incoming particles to power a Q-drive and pushing out 25% of mass to get o 8% of lightspeed would already be fantastic. The pellet stream and getting to 24% of light speed is more challenging but might be more tractable than terawatts of power beaming. Trying to find other “loopholes” or “hacks” seems worthwhile.

      • I agree that such hacks can be worthwhile. After all, while we might build a massive beam power infrastructure in solar orbit in the next 50-100 years, and be launching probes and even manned ships at fractional light speed, when they reach their destinations they’re going to have to shed that velocity somehow. Interacting with the interstellar medium and stellar winds seems the only real prospect.

        And if we can exploit physics to make the launch easier, too, it’s worth doing so.

  6. Any idea of the interplay between low density and high thermal conductivity of graphite? If it is an insulator it could be useful on earth at very high temperatures.

    • Graphite aerogel is very much a thermal insulator. And yet still electrically conductive. Which is an interesting combination.

      • ‘Upon external compression, the conductivity increases, along with material density, from ~0.2 S/m at 0.18 mg/cm3 to 0.8 S/m at 0.2 mg/cm3. The conductivity is higher for a denser material, 37 S/m at 50 mg/cm3.’

        Thermal conductivity:
        ~0.27 W/(m*K) (depending on density/fillings, aerogels ~0.017-0.025 W/(m*K) ), comparable to wood or dense polystyrene (not insulation board ~1/5-1/10, ~0.03-0.04 W/(m*k) or more than half of water (~273K)

  7. I feel like a real party pooper for mentioning that 1um thick aerographite would probably be largely transparent, even if a 1mm thick film, one thousand times thicker, wouldn’t be.

    • I added a note that we need to make the stream detectable and findable. Shine laser lights down around the path. These would spread out but photon detectors could be used to triangulate and zero in to lock in on the beam. Other signals can go down the path to make it possible to cross over near the path of pellets. Vary the signals near and on the path. A very wide and then narrowing shell of beams, to enable detection. Having things at intermediate points. Locking on to the stream passing the earth. Laying out markers as you go further and further out.
      Also, adjusting pellet release and the pellet dispenser to maintain targeting. Non-trivial but I think solvable.
      Need ultra precise station keeping

      • I personally like the proposal to create a combined mass and light beam, where the particles focus the light, and the light focuses the particles, while the difference in speed between them results in shear stabilization of the pointing direction. Of course, you reported on that back in 2018. (Comments on that article are really scrambled… so many copies of each comment!)

        I do understand the desire to directly employ solar energy, without having to convert it into electricity, and use it to power some massive particle beamer, though.

      • … or a stream of particles/pellets form lenses for focusing pathway lasers, traveling with the increasing distance?

      • Sounds easy enough to test. Make up some parts and hitch a ride on a space launch (at near zero mass so should be doable).
        Then see if the behaviour in sunlight at 1 au from the sun matches theory.

        • Oh, you can test the optical properties in an Earth lab easily enough. The only issued you’d be worried about in space that would be moderately difficult to test on Earth would be some electrostatic issues, and maybe what vacuum UV does to the material.

          But I have real doubts about this material being opaque enough to intercept most of the light hitting it, at the proposed thicknesses. The atom density per unit area gets pretty low, the light isn’t interacting with much material at that point.

Comments are closed.