Donations from Didier Coeurnelle enable next phase of LEVF (Longevity escape velocity foundation) Robust Mouse Rejuvenation research program.
The initial donation of €200,000 (approximately $220,000) will be increased by a further €200,000 donations to LEVF during the month of October 2024 will be doubled. Donate to LEVF in the next 10 days to boost antiaging research.
These donations enable a key set of pre-study pilots ahead of the next phase of LEVF’s groundbreaking investigations into the effects of combining different damage-repair interventions for middle-aged mice.
RMR1, the first phase of this Robust Mouse Rejuvenation project, has been running since February 2023, and is now nearing completion. Mice in this project have received combinations of up to four different treatments.
Goals and Motivations
As in RMR1, the ambition for RMR2 is to achieve “Robust Mouse Rejuvenation”. We define this as an intervention or treatment program that:
is applied to mice of a strain with a well-documented mean lifespan of at least 30 months
is initiated at around 12 months younger than the mean lifespan
increases both mean and maximum lifespan by at least 12 months
The primary endpoint for the study is to determine the interactions between the various interventions, as revealed by differences between treatment groups (receiving different subsets of the interventions), on overall lifespan.
However, they are also investigating aging and morbidity trajectories, causes of death, and functional decline. In this way they will add greatly to the understanding of which benefits these interventions confer and how they synergize, or possibly antagonize.
The first study extended the lifespan by about 42% or 5 months.


The more detailed analysis, teasing out the relative impact of different treatments, is getting more and more clear and interesting. Here are a few highlights.
I think we have to accept that our senolytic was a bust. We have some theories about why – more on that in due course – but in short we definitely do NOT think senolytics in general are useless, just that there’s still some way to go to extract their full potential.
As I noted in the last update, the impact of the other damage-repair treatments (HSCs and telomerase) over and above rapamycin is disappointingly insignificant in females but looks rather good in males. In fact, at this point it begins to be arguable that the damage-repair treatments actually DIMINISH the benefits of rapa in females – but have the opposite, i.e. beneficial, impact in males. This is definitely something requiring more thought – and, of course, more studies – but first let’s see how things look when RMR1 is complete.
The only-telomerase group is the one with the starkest sex-disparity: bucking the above trend, it was downright bad for male mice but definitely beneficial for females. Was that disparity big enough to survive statistical significance, given how many hypotheses we are testing simultaneously in this study? Watch this space!


Treatment 1 for RMR2- Deuterated polyunsaturated fatty acids
Lipid peroxidation occurs as a consequence of metabolism and plays a significant role in cellular dysfunction with aging. Free radicals strip electrons from membrane lipids in a cascading fashion, generating lipid peroxides and other harmful byproducts which damage DNA and proteins. Membrane integrity and fluidity are disrupted, resulting in impaired membrane transport and intracellular signaling, as well as damaging mitochondria, leading to the production of more free radicals.
Studies have found that this cascade can be inhibited, however, by replacing reactive hydrogens in candidate fatty acids with deuterium atoms, generating deuterated polyunsaturated fatty acids (D-PUFAs). This isotopic reinforcement makes D-PUFAs resistant to reactive oxygen species (ROS)-initiated chain reactions, allowing them to withstand oxidative damage. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the presence of even a small fraction of D-PUFAs among natural PUFAs in membranes will effectively inhibit lipid peroxidation, alleviating disease phenotypes several disease models. Several clinical trials utilizing D-PUFAs have been conducted in humans for a diverse range of pathologies, particularly for cognition and memory, and safety is well-established.
Further, D-PUFAs can be provided in animal chow, eliminating unnecessary injections and associated stress on the animals. When consumed, D-PUFAs incorporate into membranes in many tissues, without any reports of toxicity.
Treatment 2 for RMR2- Mouse Serum Albumin
Serum albumin is the most abundant circulating protein in mammalian plasma, accounting for approximately 60% of total blood protein. It has a critical role in maintaining the blood’s osmotic pressure and additionally serves as an important carrier protein for endogenous and exogenous ligands such as fatty acids, metal ions and drugs. It is, however, the third main function of serum albumin we are primarily interested in – that is, its role in the maintenance of intravascular redox homeostasis, a property dependent on the redox state of a free thiol on Cys34. Due to serum albumin’s abundance in plasma, this thiol contributes a large amount of ROS scavenging activity when in its reduced state, and changes in the percentage of reduced vs oxidized serum albumin are indicative in states of liver disease, renal dysfunction, and diabetes mellitus, as well as in aging.
There is promising evidence that repeated administration of physiochemically virgin serum albumin in saline can improve multiple healthspan metrics in aging mice, influencing both mean and maximum lifespan. In addition to bolstering redox buffering capacity, treatment in this way may also confer a plasma-diluting effect, which is known to rejuvenate multiple organs and tissues on its own.
Treatment 3 for RMR2 – MesenChymal Stem Cells
The progressive loss of stem cell regenerative potential remains one of the most obvious consequences of aging and is a primary focus of rejuvenation therapeutics. Thus, therapies to restore stem cell functionality, including stem cell transplant, are promising strategies for longevity medicine. Stem cell aging remains a high-value target for rejuvenation therapeutics, particularly those aiming for a systemic benefit with possible lifespan extension. Therapeutic administration of stem cells is already demonstrated to improve disease and aging phenotypes in animals and in humans and is the focus of ongoing clinical trials.
Although it is believed that the vast majority of systemically administered stem cells are eliminated from the system within a few days of injection, there are still significant and much longer-lasting physiological changes which result from body’s response to cell injections. It seems likely that the benefits of MSC therapy are via the ability of administered cells to induce changes in resident cells, promoting the switch to a regenerative phenotype, which further rejuvenates cells and tissues downstream.
Our first RMR study (RMR1) also included youthful stem cells as an intervention, however with some key differences, mainly in that it utilized lineage-depleted bone marrow stem cells (HSCs) isolated from young mice. While HSCs populate the cells of the blood and immune system, MSCs constitute an important part of the BM microenvironment that houses HSCs. In addition, the MSC lineage gives rise to many tissues including bone, fat, muscle, and cartilage, as well as endodermal and ectodermal tissues such as neurons, blood vessels, skin, and cells of the liver, pancreas, heart. MSCs can be derived from a variety of sources and can be reliably expanded ex vivo, permitting their use at scale and under repeat-dosing conditions.
Treatment 4 for RMR2 – Partial cellular reprogramming
Partial reprogramming involves the temporary activation of a set of genes known as the Yamanaka factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc), which can induce a state of cellular rejuvenation without altering the cell’s original identity. This approach addresses the aging process at the cellular level, potentially complementing other interventions and providing a comprehensive strategy for age-related therapies.
The Yamanaka factors work by rewiring the cellular epigenome, erasing certain age-associated epigenetic marks and activating genes associated with youthful characteristics. This leads to functional rejuvenation in various tissues such as the kidney, skin, liver, and muscle, enhancing tissue health and restoring the regenerative capacity of aged cells, potentially slowing down age-related decline. Further, by reducing the expression of genes involved in inflammation, senescence, and stress response pathways, partial reprogramming may delay the onset and progression of age-related diseases which contribute significantly to mortality and reduced quality of life in aging individuals.
Partial reprogramming has thus attracted substantial interest in recent years both from a research and investment standpoint. Achieving efficient and safe delivery of reprogramming factors to specific cells or tissues in vivo, however, still presents a considerable challenge and the development of practical, targeted, and cost-effective delivery methods is vital for successful application. The delivery of these factors has historically been achieved using viral vectors or genetic modifications, however recent innovations have focused on liposome-mediated delivery as mRNA, and even chemical induction of reprogramming factors using reagents and small molecules.

Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
You’d think the aging mega rich would be pumping billions into this type of research
The donated amounts make me laugh. These billionaires still think they are immortal.
Too little too late for most of us I”d say.
Based of of the work of Dr Stephanie Seneff, PhD, the addition of deuterated compounds in the presence of disrupted methylation and sulfation pathways that are common in humans exposed to glyphosate residues will induce cancer due to deuterium toxicity.
This is the summary from her lecture last year:
“Summary:
• The herbicide glyphosate is pervasive in our food supply, and it is far more toxic than our regulators are willing to admit
• Glyphosate’s mechanism of toxicity is unique, and it involves substituting for the amino acid glycine by mistake during protein synthesis in susceptible proteins
• Glyphosate disrupts sulfation and methylation pathways, which results in mitochondrial dysfunction due to excessive deuterium accumulation
• Mitochondria exposed to too much deuterium become dysfunctional, spewing out reactive oxygen species and producing inadequate amounts of ATP
• Much of the deranged metabolic policy of cancer cells can be explained as a response to deuterium toxicity.
I would reduce Deuterium, NOT increase it in my body, based on her arguments.
Hasn’t Harold Katcher already figured out how to turn back the clock with Exosomes? His experiment showed more than a 50% reduction in epigenetic age in rats, using a plasma fraction of young pig blood. Why isn’t money being poured into production schemes for young exosomes?