Russia and Ukraine punched above their weight in the fertilizer market, especially for nitrogen and potash, because of their resource advantages and production scale. Russia was the world’s top exporter of nitrogen fertilizers (like urea and ammonia), holding about 16% of global urea exports and 23% of ammonia exports before 2022 disruptions. Together with Belarus, it also supplied 40% of global potash exports, alongside Ukraine’s smaller but still notable contributions.
Abundant Natural Gas in Russia: Nitrogen fertilizers, which dominate global use, rely heavily on ammonia production via the Haber-Bosch process, where natural gas is a key feedstock (70-90% of production costs). Russia sits on massive natural gas reserves—about 19% of the world’s proven total per BP’s 2023 data—and historically kept domestic gas prices low through state control. This gave Russian producers like Uralchem and EuroChem a cost edge, letting them churn out nitrogen fertilizers cheaply and flood export markets.
Potash Reserves in Russia and Ukraine: Potash, another critical fertilizer, comes from mined potassium salts. Russia and Ukraine (along with Belarus) have some of the world’s largest deposits, notably in Russia’s Urals region and Ukraine’s Carpathian basin. Russia’s Uralkali and Belarus’s Belaruskali scaled up to export-focused giants, leveraging these reserves to meet global demand, especially in potash-hungry markets like Brazil and India.
Industrial Legacy and Export Focus: Soviet-era investments left both countries with hefty chemical and mining infrastructure. Post-1991, Russia pivoted to exports, capitalizing on low domestic demand (its ag sector is smaller than its energy focus) and proximity to Europe and Asia via Black Sea ports. Ukraine, though less dominant, piggybacked on similar infrastructure and export routes until the 2014 conflict and 2022 invasion disrupted its output.
Cheap Labor and Lax Regulation: Lower labor costs and less stringent environmental rules compared to North America kept production costs down, making their fertilizers competitive globally despite shipping expenses.
Before Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, these factors made them key suppliers. Russia alone accounted for 15-20% of global fertilizer trade across nitrogen, phosphorus, and potash, per the International Fertilizer Association, with Ukraine adding smaller but critical volumes—especially before war crippled its exports.
Why Didn’t the U.S. or Canada Use Cheap Natural Gas to Grab More Market Share?
The U.S. and Canada have cheap natural gas—thanks to the shale boom—and are fertilizer powerhouses, but they didn’t chase global dominance like Russia. Here’s why:
Domestic Focus Over Exports:
U.S.: The U.S. is the world’s top nitrogen producer (about 13% of global capacity) and a big phosphate player, but it consumes most of what it makes. Its massive corn and soybean belts guzzle fertilizers, leaving only about 10-15% of nitrogen production for export. Companies like CF Industries prioritize feeding the U.S. farm juggernaut over flooding foreign markets.
Canada: Canada leads in potash—Nutrien produces over 30% of the world’s supply from Saskatchewan—but its nitrogen output is modest. It exports heavily (especially potash to Brazil and Asia), but its fertilizer industry isn’t geared to dominate nitrogen, where Russia excelled.
Natural Gas Price Dynamics:The Bigger Picture
Russia and Ukraine thrived by marrying resource wealth with export-driven scale, while the U.S. and Canada leaned on self-sufficiency and regional strengths. Cheap gas helped North America, but they didn’t weaponize it for global market share—partly by choice, partly by circumstance. Post-2022, sanctions and war scrambled the board: Russia’s exports dropped (e.g., nitrogen exports fell 15-20% by 2023 estimates), Ukraine’s collapsed, and North America stepped up. Nutrien boosted potash output by 40% from 2020-2025, and U.S. nitrogen exports rose—but they’re still playing catch-up to Russia’s former reach, constrained by time, scale, and focus.
Russia and Ukraine dominated through gas, geology, and grit.
Maybe Food Prices Drop with Fertilizers at $300/ton vs $400/ton
Base Case: Global food prices fall 5-10% by 2026-2027 if fertilizer hits $300/ton and exports normalize. Grains lead (10-15% wholesale drop), staples like bread or rice drop 3-8% at retail. FPI lands at 115-120.
Optimistic Case: 10-15% total drop if grain supply floods and energy stays tame—FPI near 105-110, closer to 2020 norms.
Pessimistic Case: 2-5% drop if energy spikes or supply chains snag—FPI sticks at 120-125.
Post-War Scenarios for Russia and Ukraine
If the war ends then Russia will likely increase production back to 2021 levels.
Its fertilizer industry—giants like Uralchem, EuroChem, and Uralkali—remains largely intact, with production capacity (e.g., 13% of global nitrogen, 15% of potash) still operational despite sanctions. Natural gas, the backbone of nitrogen fertilizers, is abundant domestically, and prices are state-controlled (around $2-$3/MMBtu vs. $6-$8 globally), giving it a cost edge. If sanctions lift or workaround payment systems (e.g., via India or China) stabilize, Russia could flood markets again. Pre-war, it exported 20-25 million tons annually; even with a 20% hit, it retained 15-18 million tons in 2023. A peace deal could push that back toward 25 million tons within 1-2 years, assuming logistics (e.g., Black Sea shipping) normalize.
If Russia dumps cheap fertilizer post-war, it could undercut rivals and reclaim 15-18% of trade within 2-3 years. Ukraine, with higher rebuild costs, might struggle to compete unless subsidized. But if global prices stay elevated ($400+/ton), new producers might hold firm, capping Russia and Ukraine at, say, 12-15% and 1-2% of the market, respectively, by 2028.
US and Canada Natural Gas and AI Data Center Boom
Wells Fargo estimates U.S. AI data center power demand could hit 35-42 gigawatts (GW) by 2030, up from 11 GW in 2022, with AI driving a chunk of that—potentially 323 terawatt-hours (TWh) annually by 2030, per their April 2024 note. If natural gas fuels 40-60% of this (a reasonable guess given its 43% share of U.S. utility-scale power today), that’s 7-10 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of extra demand. Goldman Sachs pegs it lower at 3.3 Bcf/d, while Tudor Pickering Holt & Co. sees a high case of 8.5 Bcf/d—all by 2030.
Beyond AI, U.S. natural gas demand is already set to climb. LNG exports are projected to double from 11 Bcf/d today to 22-24 Bcf/d by 2030 as new Gulf Coast terminals come online, per Wood Mackenzie. Mexico’s imports from the U.S. could rise 50% to 6-7 Bcf/d. Add in coal plant retirements, industrial reshoring, and backup for renewables, and total U.S. demand could jump from 100 Bcf/d in 2023 to 120-130 Bcf/d by 2030—a 20-30% leap.
Canada’s story is similar: LNG Canada’s Phase 1 alone will suck up 2 Bcf/d starting 2025, and proposed AI projects could push demand from 12 Bcf/d production to 20-30 Bcf/day.
By 2035, if AI adoption accelerates to 70-100 GW—gas demand could rise another 10-20 Bcf/d.
Supply Side for 100+ Years
The U.S. has gas in spades—over 2,900 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of recoverable reserves, enough for 100+ years at current rates.
Price Drivers and Projections
Natural gas prices hinge on supply-demand balance, weather, geopolitics, and policy. Henry Hub, the U.S. benchmark, averaged $2.50/MMBtu in 2023, sank to $1.61 in early 2024 (mild winter glut), then surged to $3.73 in February 2025 amid cold snaps and LNG export records, per X posts and EIA data. The EIA’s latest (February 2025) short-term outlook sees $3.79/MMBtu in 2025 and $4.16 in 2026, reflecting storage draws and export pull.
Analysts have wide ranging estimates for 2030. $4-8 per MMBtu is common speculation.
Russia would not be as involved in the AI buildout. This would again leave more market share for simpler industrial applications like fertilizer.
Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
Is this the future of modern Agriculture? Why do we care about providing mass quantities of basic food to mass quantities of basic people? What are the values of various foodstuffs and how can we create a self-reliant, high quality, and profit-maximizing verticalized food chain to the discerning restauranteur and consumer within the G7. CA has mass areas of highly valuable produce, now partly abandoned for workers. Let’s see a Teslabot grow a tomato in a climate-contolled facility.
The cost of fertilizer is not even 1% of the price of food at the shelf, much less at restaurants. Lack of Russian fertilizer did not cause our inflation and cannot reverse it. And since they don’t have leverage over food prices, there is no economic reason to accommodate their foreign policy.
From February to April 2022, global fertilizer prices jumped nearly 50%, per USDA Economic Research Service data. Some specific increases:
Urea (nitrogen): Tripled in 2021 pre-war, then rose another 40% post-invasion, peaking at $925 per metric ton in April 2022 (World Bank).
The war’s disruption amplified an already strained market:
Supply Shock: Russia and Belarus supplied 40% of global potash and 20% of nitrogen fertilizers. Losing this volume forced importers like Brazil (40% of potash from Russia/Belarus), India, and Sub-Saharan Africa to scramble for alternatives, driving up demand and prices elsewhere.
Production Costs: Nitrogen fertilizers, tied to natural gas, saw the steepest rises. Europe, reliant on Russian gas, saw production cuts (e.g., CF Industries curtailed output), pushing prices higher globally.
Fertilizer is a critical input for staple crops, accounting for 35%-45% of operating costs for wheat and corn in the U.S., with similar ratios globally. The price surge rippled through food markets, though impacts varied by crop.
Fertilizers, rich in nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), are critical for many crops, and price spikes hit those with high nutrient demands hardest.
Corn needs 150-250 kg of nitrogen per hectare, plus phosphorus and potassium, making it highly fertilizer-intensive. Fertilizer accounts for 30-40% of production costs, so price hikes significantly raise expenses.
Rice Needs 100-150 kg of nitrogen per hectare, along with phosphorus and potassium.
Significance: Feeds over half the world’s population, especially in Asia.
Cost Effect: Higher fertilizer costs squeeze margins for farmers in rice-dependent regions. Rice prices dipped 8% or rose modestly (25%-30%), cushioned by its production dynamics. rice was less exposed to the fertilizer shock.
Hardest hit
Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
Reduced Ukrainian corn and sunflower oil exports tighten food and cooking oil supplies. High fertilizer costs strain domestic agriculture in food-scarce nations.
Sub-Saharan Africa
Nigeria, Ethiopia, Kenya: High fertilizer costs cut maize and rice yields, while wheat shortages raise food prices, exacerbating hunger.
South Africa: A maize producer, it faces rising input costs, impacting regional food supply.
Corn, rice, soybeans, rapeseed, cotton, and sugar beets face significant cost pressures due to their high nutrient needs.
Regions Hardest Hit: Middle East and North Africa (e.g., Egypt, Turkey, Lebanon), Sub-Saharan Africa (e.g., Nigeria, Kenya), South Asia (e.g., India, Bangladesh), Latin America (e.g., Brazil, Argentina), and Southeast Asia (e.g., Indonesia, Philippines) suffer from a combination of high fertilizer costs and war-driven supply chain disruptions, particularly for wheat, maize, and sunflower oil.
Food prices in the U.S. rose by 9.9% in 2022 and 5.8% in 2023, per USDA data. Fertilizer cost increases contributed about 1-2 percentage points to this inflation (10-20% of the total rise), based on USDA Economic Research Service estimates. For a $4,500-$5,000 annual food budget, overall inflation added $450-$500 in 2022, with fertilizer costs accounting for roughly $45-$100 of that increase. Corn is a main input for animal feed which impacts meat and milk.
Wheat prices were already up 27% in 2021 due to tight stocks. Post-invasion, Chicago Board of Trade wheat futures hit a 2012 peak, rising 21%-50% from February to March 2022 (UN/World Bank data).
Higher fertilizer prices raised production costs globally. Farmers in the U.S. faced $200/acre increases for corn (comparable for wheat), while in Africa, reduced fertilizer use cut yields. Ukraine’s 2022 harvest dropped 20%-30% due to input shortages, tightening supply further.
Regional Effects: Import-dependent nations like Egypt (85% of wheat from Ukraine) saw domestic prices soar, worsened by fertilizer-driven yield risks elsewhere.
The World Bank reported a 42% increase over January 2021 levels by mid-2022, with war-driven fertilizer costs contributing significantly.
Direct Link: Wheat is fertilizer-intensive, especially needing nitrogen and potash. Ukraine and Russia supplied 29% of global wheat exports pre-war, so the fertilizer shock compounded a trade disruption.
Duration: High prices persisted into 2023, influencing planting decisions worldwide. The USDA noted a 15% drop in Brazil’s fertilizer imports in Q1 2022, and Sub-Saharan Africa faced reduced usage, threatening yields.
Farm Costs: The Ukraine war drove a 71% increase in natural gas prices (remember the disruption to Europe getting natural gas and the US and Indonesia sending more liquified natural gas thus less supply for US markets and increasing prices) in 2022, pushing fertilizer costs up by 57% and raising total farm production costs for crops like corn by 12-14%.
Food Costs: This led to a 1.8-2.8% rise in retail food prices due to higher farm costs, with indirect energy effects adding 1-2%, for a total impact of 2.8-4.8%. This was a significant portion of the 9.9% food inflation Americans faced in 2022.
With farm production costs up by 12-14%, the direct effect on retail food prices was approximately 1.8-2.8% (calculated as 15-20% of the 12-14% farm cost increase).
Indirect Effects:
Higher natural gas prices also increased energy costs for irrigation, machinery, and transportation, adding an estimated 1-2% to food prices. Combining these direct and indirect effects, the total impact from higher natural gas prices was likely a 2.8-4.8% increase in retail food prices.
In 2022, U.S. food prices rose by 9.9%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The 2.8-4.8% increase tied to higher natural gas prices accounted for roughly 28-48% of this total food inflation. Other factors, like supply chain issues and labor shortages, also contributed.
Thus normalizing natural gas, fertilizer and wheat would have significant impacts for americans and particular food and fertilizer importers in Africa and middle east etc…
Higher natural gas prices from the Ukraine war clearly raised both farm and food costs, though they were one of several factors driving food inflation that year.
Here are the estimated reductions in food budgets if the Ukraine war ends and commodity prices (natural gas, fertilizer, wheat and corn) normalize:
American:
Annual Dollar Savings: $350 per household on and average $7000 per household budget.
Percentage of Food Budget: 5%.
Egyptian:
Annual Dollar Savings: $225 per person.
Percentage of Food Budget: 15%.
Nigerian:
Annual Dollar Savings: $100 per person.
Percentage of Food Budget: 10%.
There is no going back to pre-war cheap Russian exports. Russia adapted its economy, and surged its grain production for export, and about the same for all other industries. Grain export surge replaced fertiliser, LNG export surge partially replaced pipe gas – more added value captured and retained. Gas was also partially diverted into chemical synthesis (plastics).
2012 11308kt
2013 18609kt
2014 22800kt
2015 25546kt
2016 27815kt
2017 41447kt
2018 35863kt
2019 34485kt
2020 39100kt
2021 34000kt
2022 49000kt
2023 55500kt
2024 46000kt
indexmundi.com/agriculture/?country=ru&commodity=wheat&graph=exports
It is hardly even known now with any accuracy, as the era of open markets, open data and open economies ended – exports hide behind false flags, logistics is increasingly opaque, supply chains are redesigned to be invisible. None of that makes things cheaper.