Bengaluru, India, March 19th, 2025, CyberNewsWire
Moving Beyond Detection to Real-Time, Automated Security Across Workloads, Cloud, and Infrastructure
SecPod, a global cybersecurity provider, has announced the General Availability of Saner Cloud, a Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform designed to provide automated remediation and workload security across multi-cloud environments. Unlike conventional security solutions that focus primarily on detection, Saner Cloud integrates security using AI-driven automation to remediate threats in real-time.
Security teams have long faced challenges managing disparate security solutions across cloud workloads, IT infrastructure, and endpoints, often resulting in fragmented operations and a high volume of unresolved alerts. Saner Cloud is designed to address these challenges by providing a unified security platform that continuously detects, prioritizes, and remediates vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, identity risks, and compliance violations—automatically and in real time.
During the launch, Chandrashekhar Basavanna, Founder & CEO of SecPod, emphasized the urgent need to rethink cloud security and shift towards an AI-powered, prevention-first model.
“Cloud security has long been reactive—detecting risks but failing to fix them. Security is only effective when threats are eliminated before they can be exploited. The industry has spent years chasing alerts but has failed to bridge the gap between awareness and action. AI now gives us the power to move beyond detection and automate remediation at scale. Saner Cloud ensures security is enforced in real time, across every workload, every piece of infrastructure, and every cloud environment.” – Chandrashekhar Basavanna, Founder and CEO of SecPod.
Unlike legacy cloud security solutions that focus only on cloud misconfigurations or identity risks, Saner Cloud secures the full attack surface, covering endpoints, servers, network infrastructure, cloud environments, and cloud workloads – all from a single platform.
Saner Cloud leverages advanced AI-driven automation to eliminate manual security operations. Saner Cloud applies intelligent risk prioritization and executes remediation automatically, ensuring that security gaps are fixed before they can be exploited by attackers. By continuously learning from new attack patterns and security incidents, Saner Cloud dynamically adapts its security enforcement, delivering self-healing cloud infrastructure that remains protected against even the most sophisticated threats.
Most Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP) solutions focus on visibility, requiring security teams to manually address large volumes of unresolved risks. Saner Cloud is designed to bridge this gap by not only identifying security issues but also automating their remediation in real-time and at scale.
By utilizing Infrastructure-as-Code remediation, automated patching, and security policy enforcement, Saner Cloud helps mitigate compliance drift, reduce misconfiguration risks, and minimize delays in threat response. The platform continuously enforces security across cloud and IT assets while embedding compliance measures directly into cloud operations, assisting organizations in maintaining ongoing adherence to regulatory frameworks.
The launch of Saner Cloud reflects a shift toward a prevention-first approach in cloud security, focusing on reducing risk exposure rather than solely identifying threats. As cyber threats evolve, organizations require security measures that are immediate, automated, and continuous, rather than relying on manual alert response.
Saner Cloud is now available for enterprises worldwide. For more information or to schedule a demo, users can visit www.secpod.com.
About SecPod
SecPod is a leading cybersecurity technology company committed to preventing cyberattacks through proactive security. Its mission is to secure computing infrastructure by enabling preventive security posture.
At the core of SecPod’s offerings is the Saner Platform – a suite of solutions that help organizations establish a strong security posture to preempt cyber threats against endpoints, servers, networks, and cloud infrastructure, as well as cloud workloads. With its cutting-edge and comprehensive solutions, SecPod empowers organizations to stay ahead of evolving threats and build a resilient security framework.
Contact
Head – Marketing
Supriya Bhaskar Rao
SecPod Technologies
[email protected]
If I may make an observation, actually several? The gentlemen’s (I hope I’m not being gender rude, as a gay man, for the first time in a long time, today I’m sensitive to this crap) OK, question #1Since “cloud exposure”, is little more then data storage in a data site somewhere on Earth (last I heard, there are no orbital “data storage centers)”. Why? Do the math More importantly, the physics. It still costs a FANTASTISIC amount of money to put anything in near or far Earth orbit. You “save that energy, today”, by putting in orbit what we can today, sensors, and communication’s “stuff”. We’re good at that. Thank God. Think WW3 hasn’t yet happened just because of (so far) luck? Honestly, IMO, yes, THAT is true in several situations.
But in others? We’ve intercepted communication’s that we thought could be threating to us. Now, this is a more nuanced aspect of intelligence. How do you convey to a potential enemy, you know what they “might” do, but you don’t want them to do that? Better, how do you “do that”, without letting them know, how you know? No comment, kids…All so-called :cloud storage”, are based on data storage in centers, very much on (or underneath) the Earth. Lets take the security protocol’s in this article 1X1? #1. ( For the record, I’m just asking questions. I do so quite honestly. If I overtly questioned what you said, I would do so, very openly. In case you haven’t noticed, I’m not shy.) I find your post most interesting, and want to learn more. However. IMO, in anticipating “attacks” from any attacker, one has to anticipate who that attacker might be, and knowing that how they could attack. (This is what I call, the “technological -mind-f***)
Example? Pearl Harbor. Then (1941) the Japanese aircraft were faster, better armed, and more maneuverable then our lumbering P-40 Warhawk’s. It’s amazing, some of our guys managed to shoot some of the other bastards down, but a few did. Our American guys had NO combat experience. . Yes, I’ve heard the conspiracy crap “we knew the attack on Pearl Harbor would happen, and when” and it’s bulls***. Did we think we’d be attacked, somewhere, someplace at that time? Yes we did. But perhaps Midway, Wake Island, etc. But Pearl? Impossible! (Oh by the way, for those of you aware we had broken Japanese and a few military codes, we did. The Japanese task force after leaving their waters operated under ABSOLUTE RADIO SILENCE. Nothing to intercept, if there’s nothing to hear… It was only American bigotry that “convinced” us “they wouldn’t dare attack Pearl!” Despite being the most logical US Pacific military target.
What’s interesting is not what the Japanese DID NOT target when they attacked, but why. After the war, our people interviewed several surviving (obviously) pilots who attacked Pearl. The idea was to understand their “order of battle”. They we’re hopeful to find our aircraft carriers in port (thank God, they were not). Their next targets we’re our Capital ships, the Battleships, Heavy Cruisers. Many were hit, several sunk with much loss of life. Showing a former pilot photos of the area prior to attack, he was ask to identify “objects” in the photo. He was superbly briefed. He could name each ship by name, type, and tonnage. (But not “average” crew size, that can vary)
Also, each road and “facility” surrounding the base. The intel officer asked one man, if he recognized several large circular containers. He said “Of course, they are oil storage tanks no doubt used to supply your Pacific Fleet” (It’s a military legend, but I heard the intel guy wet his pants when he heard that. What I would have done, would have been a lot less dignified) Point? The intel guy asked “Why didn’t you take out our fuel supply, it would have been easy”? (If done, it would have crippled American operations in the Pacific, for at least a year)
But the pilot said, something like: “you (USA) have more oil then God. We went to war with you because you cut us off from your oil!” And so it goes. The most “ideal” targets, where thought to be, unimportant. Just as our own prejudice blinded us as to the attack on Pearl Harbor, our enemies preconceived idea of us, prevented them from attacking the most obvious target. Not our ships, our fuel. As we saw, we rebuilt our ships very quickly. But our fuel? That’s always harder. This is a classic example of what a technology is, and how it matters in a socio-cultural world example. #2: You mention “identifying consequences of threats” before you identify the threats? Really? Actually, there are several companies, and intelligence agencies working on what I call “Predictive Morphology”. Predicting the future based on quantum mechanics. But your not (it seems) going in that area. Questions: You mention learning when attacked, are you talking about deploying a shadow or ghost image as some kind of “deflector shield”? In other words, To directly absorb an attack, and “sort it out later”, isn’t that risky? What if that attack you didn’t anticipate? (been known to happen) Let me say, I think ideas are very interesting. But I have questions (it’s OK, I always do) I (like to think) I understand biological informatics far more “naturally” then anything digital.
Biological systems, are intensely robust. No, they don’t “compute” as fast as digital stuff does. Spill water on my hand? I wipe it off. I once spilled water on my desktop, and it literally, I’m not making this up, burst into flames. NOT what I expected. Fortunately, I had a fire extinguisher. Point, once again, biology deals with it never could imagine. If not? Life wouldn’t be “alive”, very long. Much more to say on this fascinating topic, later.