Lockheed Martin’s newly unveiled Vectis drone will be a groundbreaking advancement in unmanned aerial systems. Lockheed Martin has introduced Vectis and describes it as the most advanced fighter drone ever built. It has not been built yet. It is in simulation and design. It is classified as a Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) by the U.S. Air Force.
Vectis is a self-funded initiative by Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works division, with prototype parts already ordered and a team actively executing the project. The company is investing its own resources to design, build, and test the drone, aiming for a first flight by the end of 2027. It is positioned as a high-end, stealthy Group 5 CCA candidate for potential future competitions. The Air Force’s fiscal year 2026 budget requests $111 million overall for the CCA program, with an additional $678 million proposed over five years via a reconciliation bill, but these funds are not specified for Lockheed or Vectis.
Vectis will merge 5th-generation (F-35-like stealth and sensors) and 6th-generation (advanced autonomy and networking) fighter technologies into a single, low-observable (stealthy) combat drone.
It can function as a standalone system for independent missions or as part of an integrated network supporting crewed fighters, bombers, or other assets.
The Vectis drone features a sophisticated sensor suite resembling the F-35’s Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS), as seen in Lockheed’s promotional footage. This allows for superior target detection and engagement.
Its extreme low-observability (aka stealth) provides capabilities more aligned with current 5th-generation fighters (F-22/F-35) than with lower-cost CCA drones that are already in testing. This design choice positions Vectis as a high-end, versatile platform rather than a basic attritable (expendable) drone.
Capable mid-range systems are already in flight testing. These are the General Atomics’ YFQ-42 and Anduril’s YFQ-44.
The Vectis is a superdrone that goes beyond those drones in planned features.
The strategic plan is to flood the battlespace with a mix of cheap, disposable units and some more costly advanced, survivable drones.
Lockheed competed for the Air Force’s initial batch of CCA contracts but lost to General Atomics and Anduril. Their proposal was rejected as gold-plated. It was too stealthy, autonomous, and expensive for the service’s early needs.
John Clark (Lockheed executive) admitted the design exceeded requirements for Tranche 1. The first batch prioritized cost-effective air-to-air platforms. The main functin was drones carrying two AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles each.
The Vecctis drone evolves the prior over-engineered CCA concept. Lockheed is still trying to get the air force to use a more premium drone.
The Vectis Airframe Design uses a stealthy lambda-delta wing configuration, a dorsal-mounted air intake with an S-duct and exhaust shrouding to minimize infrared signatures.
Vectis exists primarily in digital simulations, where it has undergone extensive testing, including cooperative missions with virtual F-22s and F-35s.
There is no physical prototype yet. The first flight is expected in about 2 years (around 2027).
Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
Not that Lockheed-Martin is even working on NGAD anyway. They either lost out or purposely passed on that contract. And I don’t buy that it was in lieu of drone or hypersonics development. No drone or even hypersonics, no matter how useful, is going to be anywhere near seemingly magical. I eagerly await the magical thing that Jim Taiclet reference a while back.
Ahead of time, I realize how totally whacky this may seem. But I’m generally given to moods of, “I said what I said.”
I’ve heard murmurs (mostly in subreddits, so take that as you will) that this and/or the NGAD fighter are the “magical” technology that Lockheed-Martin teased a few months back, and took a massive financial hit for developing.
But, nothing that flies with public-facing propulsion technology, and that will be classified and conversationally mum for years to come, fits “magical” [in my mind]. Not in any way, shape or form.
The only thing that fits “magical” is an aerospace platform that utilizes *only* field propulsion as a means of movement. To me, that’s the only game-changer. It would render even fancy hypersonics obsolete the moment it becomes active. That’s worth the secrecy. That’s worth the monetary drain. That’s worth giving up contracts worth billions.
Simply the thought process, alone, that could lead to the development of that type of platform would be worth the financial hit and eventual payout.
And by the time they have their first prototype, Anduril will have updated Fury with the latest AI, making it both cheaper and more effective…