SpaceX officially detailed progress on the Starship HLS for NASA’s Artemis 3 mission and had a new faster, safer and simpler plan for returning astronauts to the Moon. This responds to the push from NASA and the President for faster lunar landings. SpaceX has completed 49 milestones under the fixed-price Human Landing System (HLS) contract. They have 2026 tests for long-duration flights and in-space propellant transfer.
Since the contract was awarded, SpaceX has consistently been responsive to NASA as requirements for Artemis III have changed and have shared ideas on how to simplify the mission to align with national priorities. SpaceX has shared and is formally assessing a simplified mission architecture and concept of operations that they believe will result in a faster return to the Moon while simultaneously improving crew safety.

Key elements of the faster/simplified plan:
Streamlining operations to reduce complexity, align with updated Artemis III requirements, and enable quicker mission timelines without compromising safety.
Retains Starship’s reusability, 100-ton cargo capacity to the lunar surface, and in-orbit refueling to support sustainable moon presence.



SpaceX is self-funding representing over 90% of system costs for Starship and HLS.
Starship development along two paths:
1. development of the core Starship system and supporting infrastructure, including production facilities, test facilities, and launch sites
2. development of the HLS-specific Starship configuration, which leverages and modifies the core vehicle capability to support NASA’s requirements for landing crew on and returning them from the Moon.
A single Starship has a pressurized habitable volume of more than 600 cubic meters, which is roughly two-thirds the pressurized volume of the entire International Space Station. It has complete cabin that can be scaled for large numbers of explorers and dual airlocks for surface exploration.
Each of Starship’s two airlocks have a habitable volume of approximately 13 cubic meters, which is more than double the space that was available in the Apollo lander.
Cargo variants of the Starship lander will be capable of landing up to 100 metric tons directly on the surface, including large payloads like unpressurized rovers, pressurized rovers, nuclear reactors, and lunar habitats.
SpaceX has already produced more than three dozen Starships and 600 Raptor rocket engines, with more than 226,000 seconds of run time on the Raptor 2 engine and more than 40,000 seconds of run time on the next-generation Raptor 3 engine. There have been 11 Starship-only flight tests and 11 integrated flight tests of Starship and Super Heavy. In parallel, SpaceX has constructed, and continues to construct, new Starship launch, production, integration, and test facilities in Texas, Florida, and California. This private investment of billions of dollars is creating more than five million square feet of manufacturing and integration space, five launch pads across Texas and Florida, and multiple Raptor test stands, all engineered to ramp Starship’s launch cadence above and beyond the paradigm-redefining rate achieved by SpaceX’s Falcon program.
SpaceX’s HLS team has completed 49 milestones tied to developing the subsystems, infrastructure, and operations needed to land astronauts on the Moon. SpaceX has received money only on contractual milestones that have been successfully completed, the vast majority of which have been achieved on time or ahead of schedule.
Highlights of completed milestones include:
* Lunar environmental control and life support and thermal control system demonstrations, using a full-scale cabin module inhabited by multiple people to test the capability to inject oxygen and nitrogen into the cabin environment and accurately manage air distribution and sanitation, along with humidity and thermal control. The test series also measured the acoustic environments inside the cabin
* Docking adapter qualification of the docking system that will link Starship and Orion in space, an androgynous SpaceX docking system capable of serving as the active system or passive system and based on the flight-proven Dragon 2 active docking system
* Landing leg drop test of a full-scale article at flight energies onto simulated lunar regolith to verify system performance and to study foot-to-regolith interaction
* Raptor lunar landing throttle test demonstrating a representative thrust profile that would allow Starship to land on the lunar surface
* Micrometeoroid and orbital debris testing of shielding, insulation, and window panels, analyzing different material stackups that will be used to protect Starship from impact hazards and harsh thermal conditions
* Landing software, sensor, and radar demonstrations testing navigation and sensing hardware and software that will be used by Starship to locate and safely descend to a precise landing site on the Moon
* Software architecture review to define the schematic of major vehicle control processes, what physical computers they will run on, and software functions for critical systems like fault detection, caution and warning alerts, and command and telemetry control
* Raptor cold start demonstrations using both sea-level and vacuum-optimized Raptor engines that are pre-chilled prior to startup to simulate the thermal conditions experienced after an extended time in space
* Integrated lunar mission operations plan review, covering how SpaceX and NASA will conduct integrated operations, develop flight rules and crew procedures, and the high-level mission operation plan
* Depot power module demonstration, testing prototype electrical power generation and distribution systems planned to be used on the propellant depot variant of Starship
* Ground segment and radio frequency (RF) communications demonstration, testing the capability to send and receive RF communications between a flight-equivalent ground station and a flight-equivalent vehicle RF system
* Elevator and airlock demonstration, which was conducted in concert with Axiom to utilize flight-representative pressurized EVA suits, to practice full operation of the crew elevator which will be used to transfer crew and cargo between Starship and the lunar surface
* Medical system demonstration covering the crew medical system on Starship and the telemedicine capability between the ground and crew
* Hardware in the loop testbed activation for the propellant transfer flight test which uses a testbed with flight representative hardware to run simulations for the upcoming propellant transfer flight test
Next Steps
Many of SpaceX’s remaining HLS contract milestones are tied to flight tests, such as a ship-to-ship propellant transfer demonstration, SpaceX has started fabricating a flight-article Starship HLS cabin that will include functional avionics and power systems, crew systems and mechanisms, environmental control and life support systems, cabin and crew communications systems, and a cabin thermal control system. This flight-capable cabin will enable engineers to demonstrate high design maturity of the various systems required to support a human landing on the Moon, enable integrated system-level hardware testing, and provide a highly realistic training experience for future lunar explorers.
The next major flight milestones tied specifically to HLS will be a long-duration flight test and the in-space propellant transfer flight test. The exact timing will be driven by how upcoming flight tests debuting the new Starship V3 architecture progress, but both of these tests are targeted to take place in 2026. On-orbit refilling enables Starship to complete the Artemis lunar mission architecture and carry up to 100 tons directly to the lunar surface, providing the capability to carry rovers, habitats, and other payloads needed to establish a permanent, and sustainable, presence on the Moon.
It will start with a Starship launched from Starbase to spend an extended time on orbit, gathering data on vehicle propulsion and thermal behavior on an extended duration mission, including long duration propellant storage and boil-off characterization. A second Starship will then launch to rendezvous with the first to demonstrate ship-to-ship propellant transfer in Earth orbit.
Starship V3 vehicles come equipped with docking ports and can be configured to act as tanker vehicles with the addition of docking probes. Starship also has a connection point where propellants are loaded onto the vehicle in preparation for launch that has been updated to enable on-orbit propellant transfer. For rendezvous, Starships will be equipped with DragonEye navigation sensors, which have extensive flight heritage from their use on SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft during dozens of dockings to the International Space Station. These sensors have undergone separate testing to characterize their performance for use on Starship. SpaceX has also been flying experimental propellant gauging sensors on every recent Starship flight test which use radio frequency measurements to accurately measure propellant levels while in microgravity.

Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
One approach could be to affix an ascent module to the nose of Starship once in LEO.
Then the crew can use that to return to lunar orbit, leaving the entire ship behind as a base.
It could act as a lifeboat,too, if necessary.
In place of legs, have “spears”.
No feet, just straight, pointed legs that drive down into the regolith.
Use hydrolic shocks to cushion the contact, then to level the ship.
Maybe inject a hardening resin through the legs feet to prevent pulling out.
Even if the entire Starship launches back to orbit, leave the piers behind for future use as a base support structure.
Less mass to lift., too.
Perhaps an article on the simplified plan should wait until we know something — anything at all — about the simplified plan.
Orion/Artemis is just not practically feasible financially in the long run. SpaceX has the right approach, reusability. Even the Chinese are getting on board with this for their lunar mission ships.
The fact of the matter is that government, particularly democratic ones, need to remove themselves from the space race and allow the private sector to do what they do best without wasting taxpayer dollars on this. There is no real benefit any longer like there used to be when the private sector couldn’t do it alone. Now they can. Let them do the heavy lifting.
I believe Elon Musk should be handed the funding from the us government to head up development of most all future space vehicles ,rocket motors, and planing for space travel for the USA. NASA doesn’t seem able to keep up with him .
SpaceX have yet to demonstrate in-orbit refuelling. They also have yet to demonstrate surviving takeoff without a waterfall system adequately enough to land. There’s a lot of work to be done, and given their iteration style it seems like there will need to be a few unmanned Lunar missions before they can meet the Artemis specifications.
The purpose of the waterfall system is to enable the launch pad to survive the BOOSTER takeoff thrust, and noise suppression so that the sheer sound energy doesn’t pulverize the tiles.
The block 4 booster is expected to have a thrust of about 11,000 tons. The Starship itself has about a quarter that thrust, and for taking off from the Moon, will need less than a sixth of it, about 500 tons thrust. And on the Moon noise suppression is not an issue, since there’s no atmosphere to conduct sound. The big issue for the Moon takeoff and landing is avoiding the rocket thrust excavating a hole under the starship. To that end, the lunar starship is planned to have a secondary ring of canted engines near the top, so that the exhaust will be diffuse by the time it reaches the surface.
So the lack of a water deluge system on the Moon won’t be an issue.
That may be part of the purpose, but don’t you remember the first launch test of the superheavy booster losing engines due to debris strikes on the ground? The ejecta may be less, but there are fewer redundant engines on Starship, and no upper stage to act as launch escape.
A secondary ring of engines near the top is exactly the right solution, though. Where’s the information on that?
It’s been reported for years in various places. See, for instance, the wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Landing_System#Starship_HLS
“If needed, the variant will use high-thrust CH4/O2 RCS thrusters located mid-body on Starship HLS during the final “tens of meters” of the terminal lunar descent and landing,”
Followed by, [citation needed]… There may be more information on it but that’s just funny.
I’d have given you a better link, but, frankly, Google sucks these days, so I just stopped at the first responsive site.
Here’s an old publicity render from NASA. Notice the ring of thrusters just under the solar panels?
https://web.archive.org/web/20210419190611/https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/for_press_release.jpg
Just remember Starship is being built to land humans on Mars. Congress only funded NASA to build SLS & Orion they did not fund a Lunar lander.
NASA saw an opportunity to use Starship as a lunar lander and SX was most likely going to use the Moon for testing. Besides if we’re all being honest if SX can land a ship on Mars, no one is going to care about going back to the Moon.
“SpaceX has shared and is formally assessing a simplified mission architecture and concept of operations that they believe will result in a faster return to the Moon while simultaneously improving crew safety.”
The part I’m missing here is, this is a simplified mission architecture: What got taken out?
Are they omitting the lunar gateway station and going for a direct to lunar surface trajectory?
Nothing was announced in this update on the simpler and faster plan. They gave that plan to NASA and did not tell us publicly until nasa approves
The most likely plan would be to dispense with Orion entirely, and have the moon-bound crew dock with HLS in Earth orbit, using a Falcon/Dragon combo. Currently Orion is supposed to dock with HLS in lunar orbit, which seems unnecessarily risky. For the return to Earth, HLS could lift off from the lunar surface, top off its fuel at a SpaceX Starship tanker in lunar orbit, then return to Earth orbit, where the crew would transfer to another Dragon and land on Earth. This could be vastly cheaper than the current strategy, which puts the hugely expensive SLS and Orion in the critical path.