India and China Superconductor Researchers Publish Negative LK-99 Replication Attempts on Arxiv

Arxiv – Semiconducting transport in Pb10-xCux(PO4)6O sintered from Pb2SO5 and Cu3P

Li Liu, Ziang Meng, Xiaoning Wang, Hongyu Chen,Zhiyuan Duan, Xiaorong Zhou, Han
Yan, Peixin Qin*, Zhiqi Liu*
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

The very recent claim on the discovery of ambient-pressure room-temperature superconductivity in modified lead-apatite has immediately excited sensational attention in the entire society, which is fabricated by sintering lanarkite (Pb2SO5) and copper(I) phosphide (Cu3P). To verify this exciting claim, we have successfully synthesized Pb2SO5, Cu3P, and finally the modified lead-apatite Pb10-xCux(PO4)6O. Detailed electrical transport and magnetic properties of these compounds were systematically analyzed. It turns out that Pb2SO5 is a highly insulating diamagnet with a room-temperature resistivity of ~7.18×10^9 this http URL and Cu3P is a paramagnetic metal with a room-temperature resistivity of ~5.22×10^-4 this http URL. In contrast to the claimed superconductivity, the resulting Pb10-xCux(PO4)6O compound sintered from Pb2SO5 and Cu3P exhibits semiconductor-like transport behavior with a large room-temperature resistivity of ~1.94×10^4 this http URL although our compound shows greatly consistent x-ray diffraction spectrum with the previously reported structure data. In addition, when a pressed Pb10-xCux(PO4)6O pellet is located on top of a commercial Nd2Fe14B magnet at room temperature, no repulsion could be felt and no magnetic levitation was observed either. These results imply that the claim of a room-temperature superconductor in modified lead-apatite may need more careful re-examination, especially for the electrical transport properties.

Synthesis of possible room temperature superconductor LK-99: Pb9Cu(PO4)6O

Kapil Kumar, N.K. Karn, and V.P.S. Awana
1CSIR-National Physical Laboratory, Dr. K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi-110012, India.
2Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India.

Abstract:
The quest for room temperature superconductors have been teasing the scientists and physicists, since its inception in 1911 itself. Several assertions have already been made about room temperature superconductivity, but were never verified or reproduced across the labs. The cuprates were the earliest high transition temperature (Tc) superconductors, and it seems that copper has done the magic once again. Last week, a Korean group synthesized a Lead Apatite based compound LK-99, showing a Tc of above 400K. The signatures of superconductivity in the compound are very promising, in terms of resistivity (ρ = 0) and diamagnetism at Tc. Although, the heat capacity (Cp) did not show the obvious transition at Tc. Inspired by the interesting claims of above room temperature superconductivity in LK-99, in this article, we report the synthesis of polycrystalline samples of LK-99, by following the same heat treatment as reported in by two step precursor method. The phase is confirmed through X-ray diffraction (XRD)
measurements, performed after each heat treatment. The room temperature diamagnetism is not evidenced by the levitation of a permanent magnet over the sample or vice versa. Further measurements for the confirmation of bulk superconductivity on variously synthesized samples are underway. Our results on present LK-99 sample, being synthesized at 9250C, as of now do not approve the appearance of bulk superconductivity at room temperature. Further studies with different heat treatments are though, yet underway.

12 thoughts on “India and China Superconductor Researchers Publish Negative LK-99 Replication Attempts on Arxiv”

  1. What a contrast between the Chinese and Indian abstracts.

    The Chinese one gets straight to the point, uses plain language, and looks very professional.

    The Indian one needlessly summarizes the history of superconductors, invents entirely new and strange sounding English idioms all over the place, misuses words, and looks like it was written by a 12 year old doing a book report.

    It’s encouraging at least that the Indian team is going to continue trying new method.

  2. The South Koreans have been at it since 2020, or perhaps even earlier. I’m pretty sure that they know what they are on about.

  3. There is followers, There is people who do and try and theres people who do to just to scam.
    -followers will never be happy because they never do anything for them selves and expect new technology to be handed to them on a silver plate.
    -those who do and try new ways dont care for fame, they are creative with life and for There new discoveries only get suppressed due to other organizations to buy patents and never do anything with it because they know it’s not profitable to save on energy usage. Or make product to last forever, the world runs on planned obsolescence.
    – hence Scammers every Industry, organization, corporation, and even small businesses only care about profit and profiting even more. To do so you must take advantage of consumers. Imagen if a product was 100% efficient and lasted forever, there be less waste in garbage and rescources and nobody would make any money.

  4. You can bet this will eventually happen. If everyone claims they can’t make it then the pressure gets put back on the original team. Peer review process will also require additional experiments on these original samples. This story is far from being over. Things could get very interesting…or it could end up being yet another retracted result. The interesting thing is the theoretical results of course supporting this…

  5. Just test the material which Koreans created and we all saw in the vid.

    I think it’s not as easy to synthesise LK-99 as some people think and others claim. If 1000 teams will try, maybe one will have luck and create fragment, which will be also levitating.

    Maybe we need 10 000 attempts, to have luck.

    • Then it’s junk science. If it’s not replicatible, we haven’t figured it out yet. That means we don’t know how to do it lol

      • I agree with this. There’s probably a formula in constructing the material so that it is in perfect alignment. It’s quite possible that these materials can be put together in many different ways and only one of those ways is the one that produces the effect. So you need to create a pure sample where everything is connected in precisely the right way. They need to have a theory on why it works as well.

      • It’s no junk science! What a 🧹 generalization. Could be that the nature of the crystal is important?

  6. Looks like they got burned by the vagaries of synthesis, if the second to lowest Pb site being replaced with Cu is the key.

Comments are closed.