Professor Chen at the Beijing University of Science and Technology has a statistical theory of superconductors. It is an attempt at a unified theory of superconductors based on statistical material law. It is a statistical law that indicates a positive correlation between the overall energy band width for all interacting orbital energy range and the maximum critical temperature. And below the trend line, it reflects the flatness of the energy band. As a statistical law without relying on any superconducting mechanism, it provides an independent statistical analysis conclusion on RT superconductivity problems.
Currently, no existing theory can provide a clear answer to the various phenomena of LK99. This is because we are completely unaware of the rules that metals, compounds, iron, and copper share the same foundation but are not separated from each other.
Statistical Material Law Support for Room Temperature Superconductivity in the Lead Apatite System
Ning Chen1* , Yang Liu1 , and Yang Li2*
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, P.R. China
2 Department of Engineering Science and Materials, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 00681-9000, USA
Abstract
Quantum mechanics calculations of an electronic orbital coupling distribution of the new possible Room Temperature (RT) system of lead apatite Pb10(PO4)6O system show that a complex orbital coupling characteristics of the new system are similar to those of copper oxide, and with multiple orbital interactions. The overall bandwidth is significantly larger than the current largest copper oxide system, which can also be compared to near RT high-pressure hydride systems. By applying a material dependence law relating overall band width to superconducting critical temperature across various typical superconducting systems, we predict that the electronic structure of the new material can support achieving RT superconductivity in condition of a flatter band.
Although over hundreds of typical superconductors with relatively high critical temperatures have been discovered to date, they can be simply classified into four families with similar energy band structure characteristics and similar superconducting temperatures: pure metals (Critical temperature less than 10K) and intermetallic compounds (Tc less than 40K, also including high-pressure hydrides, Tc over 100K), as well as high-temperature superconducting systems (iron-based compounds, Tc=21-55K, and copper oxides, Tc=32-132K). Each system has around a dozen typical examples suitable for analysis, accounting for 70% of all data. By analyzing the energy band characteristics related to orbital interactions, an overall band width can be obtained by ignoring isolated orbital bands, not just the width of the valence or conduction band.
Our statistical law indicates a positive correlation between the overall energy band width for all interacting orbital energy range and the maximum critical temperature. And below the trend line, it reflects the flatness of the energy band. As a statistical law without relying on any superconducting mechanism, it provides an independent statistical analysis conclusion on RT superconductivity problems.
In summary, according to our statistical law relating electronic structure and superconducting critical temperature, an independent conclusion has been obtained that the new lead apatite system can support RT critical temperature limit of superconductivity, in condition of a proper flat band. This result is independent of experiment and theory, even superconducting mechanism. We believe the laws of materials are the foundation of the theory of superconductivity, opening a window for us to see the mysterious world of RT superconductivity more clearly. From this perspective, clarifying this law is as important as experimentally confirming a RT superconductor.
My research is completely independent of previous experiments and theories. Because of the controversy over LK-99, statistical data were able to determine the truth.
LK-99 is real.
My statistical data theory predicts that LK-99 is genuine. However, the superconducting current is weak, and there is weak magnetism and electrical resistance.
Comments indicate that Professor Chen has already reported to the giants of the Chinese scientific community (according to the comments, Chinese netizens are mentioning real names).
This is the first time I’ve seen a professor from Beijing University of Science and Technology speaking with such confidence.
This is a post recently uploaded by Britz in the DC community.
The post from Professor Chen at the Beijing University of Science and Technology :
Researchers in materials science always have one goal: synthesizing a material and understanding its structure, composition, and… pic.twitter.com/bC10pAMi4N
— XD (@lSINlll) August 15, 2023
Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
This proves nothing, and lk 99 is not even a proven superconductor at any temperature (and no, the measurement at 110K didn’t show a superconducting transition).
Why is every little thing about lk99 getting pushed on here. Until something substantial happens, perhaps it’s time to give it a rest?
Because clicks.
It’s all just noise until independent verification of superconductivity.