Latest presentation from Superpower inc on superconducting wire.
For Superconducting Magnet Energy Storage (SMES) to compete with lead-acid batteries and other technologies, SMES systems may need to be significantly larger than the 1-to-2-megawatt-hour devices envisioned by ABB. They may need to offer tens of megawatt hours of storage, Luongo says, "and the cheaper the other technologies get, the farther out that crossover point gets."
Matching the price of lead-acid batteries would make SMES systems less expensive than flywheels but more expensive than pumped hydro or compressed air, according to a recent study by the Electric Power Research Institute. Pumped hydro, which stores energy by pumping water uphill, and compressed air, which stores energy in the form of air compressed in underground caverns, are the two leading methods for storing energy on a large scale today.
SMES systems have about the same life expectancy as pumped hydro and compressed air systems: 10-20 years, as opposed to 1-10 years for batteries and 8-12 years for flywheels, Minnihan says. He has reservations about ABB's approach because it requires large quantities of high-temperature superconducting wires that at today's prices would make grid-scale SMES systems prohibitively expensive.
Although the cost of superconducting wire has dropped significantly in recent years, Ramanan admits that it would need to fall by another 300 percent for SMES to be competitive with other grid-scale energy-storage technologies
If you liked this article, please give it a quick review on ycombinator or StumbleUpon. Thanks