YCBO superconductor at 105K and upcoming 195K superconductor

Superconductors.org reports the critical transition temperature (Tc) of the industrial superconductor YBCO (YBa2Cu3O7) has been successfuly increased from 92K to near 105K by reformulating to Y3Ba5Cu8Ox. No new elements were added.

Y-358 – dubbed “Ultra YBCO” – is a novel intergrowth incorporating two different types of planar weight disparity (PWD) and a larger unit cell (around 31.2Ã). The target structure, shown below left, is colinear and does not incorporate branching of the CuO2 chains, as occurs in the Y-124 and Y-247 structure types.

Other YBCO variants have also been discovered by Superconductors.ORG, but had limitations vis-a-vis standard YBCO. “Super YBCO” (Tc up to 107K) required the use of an expensive heavy rare earth oxide to synthesize. And “Enhanced YBCO” (Tc 97K) was not homogenous. Its volume fraction appeared to be around 30%. Ultra YBCO should cost no more than standard YBCO to manufacture.

Synthesis of the material was by the solid state reaction method. Stoichiometric amounts of the below precursors were mixed, pelletized at 70,000 psi and sintered for 11 hours at 890C. The pellet was then annealed for 10 hours at 500C in flowing O2.

Superconductors.org is also teasing that they have a superconductor that works at 195K which is the dry ice sublimation temperature [-78 Celsius which is 195 Kelvin]

So this year has seen excellent experimental progress being made to room temperature (300K) superconductors as well as theoretical progress. There has also been the whole new class of higher temperature iron based superconductors.

About The Author

Add comment

E-mail is already registered on the site. Please use the Login form or enter another.

You entered an incorrect username or password

Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment.


by Newest
by Best by Newest by Oldest

ok, full text feed reactivated


[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

This makes me sad. 🙁

For a discussion of why partial text feeds are a bad idea: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070813/014338.shtml