30% Less Fuel Consumption from New NASA Truss X-Plane

The new X-plane seeks to enable a potential new generation of more sustainable single-aisle aircraft – the workhorse of passenger airlines around the world. Working with NASA, Boeing will build, test, and fly a full-scale demonstrator aircraft with extra-long, thin wings stabilized by diagonal struts, known as a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing concept.

The X-66A will validate technologies for a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing configuration that, when combined with other advancements in propulsion systems, materials, and systems architecture, could result in up to 30% less fuel consumption and reduced emissions when compared with today’s best-in-class aircraft.

Due to their heavy usage, single-aisle aircraft today account for nearly half of worldwide aviation emissions. Creating designs and technologies for a more sustainable version of this type of aircraft has the potential for profound impact on emissions.

4 thoughts on “30% Less Fuel Consumption from New NASA Truss X-Plane”

  1. “Rolls-Royce announces new turbogenerator to power hybrid electric flight”
    ‘interestingengineering.com/innovation/rolls-royce-turbogenerator-hybrid-electric-flight-hydrogen?dicbo=v2-zIGoo2K’

    Each turbo jet engine on cruising speed (~3/4 of engine power (737) ~122kN) at ~250m/s would require ~24MW and with high performance electric motors to achieve ~12kW/kg (topping at todays maybe 15-17kW/kg) electrically supported cruising speeds would require 2x ~3t or 4x ~1.5t electrical motor powered impellers for 737 plane sizes(?).

  2. We should have moved to a blue hydrogen based jet and rocket fuels. That is the 100% cut that the world need.

    • Hydrogen, if it leaks (which it will, it can percolate through metals) has a global warming potential of about 30x that of CO2, calculated over 20 years, and about half as bad as methane. It will also produce N2O when burned – that has a global warming potential about 260 (x CO2’s, again) – and water vapour, which normally rains out on saturation at lower altitudes, but released in the stratosphere can persist, and is another strong IR absorber.

    • Storage density. You have an aircraft with hydrogen fuel, it has a much higher volume and thus surface area, and thus drag. It only works for rockets because they leave the atmosphere as quickly as they possibly can.

      Hydrogen is a terrible aircraft fuel. If we want a 100% cut, we’re better off looking at solar thermal synthesis of hydrocarbons from CO2 and water.

Comments are closed.