China LK99 Researchers Claim They Surpassed Original Korean Team

China room temperature superconductor researcher Professor Yao Yao believes that the Original Korean team (Lee and Sukbae) took the wrong line of research by focusing too much on zero resistance and ignoring the magnetic phase. Yao yao believes that the CSU research group caught up with Lee’s team last November.

3 thoughts on “China LK99 Researchers Claim They Surpassed Original Korean Team”

  1. I am dubious about these claims. It’s important to critically evaluate such statements and consider the evidence before drawing conclusions. Without further evidence or corroborating sources, it’s challenging to ascertain the validity of Yao Yao’s assertions.

  2. All these reports are that lk99 shows the expected side-effects of superconductivity, like microwave absorption and levitation, but the actual superconductivity is elusive. Doesn’t bode well.

    • Flux pinning is pretty strong indirect proof of superconductivity, though. The reason the flux is pinned is that the magnetic flux is excluded from the bulk of the superconductor, it gets pinched into “flux tubes” surrounded by circular persistent currents that exactly cancel the flux outside the tube.

      Those tubes then get pinned to non-superconducting defects in the superconductor, because the ring current can’t cross the non-superconducting bits. (You would still get the tubes in a perfect superconductor, but they’d rapidly migrate towards the edge and dump the flux there without the defects to tie them down.)

      You simply don’t see this behavior without zero conductivity. And defects, of course, to do the pinning.

      It’s actually pretty impressive, if you’ve ever seen it, seeing a bit of superconductor locked in orientation to a magnet, just floating there in the air like there was some invisible rod connecting it to the magnet.

Comments are closed.