New China LK99-Like Superconductor Research and Imminent Patent

A LK99 researcher from Hubei, China, said that his paper might not be released before the Lunar New Year because of patent issues, announced the main findings of the paper, which detected three specific magnetic pointing superconductivity in the samples. He also described improved synthesis methods.

China Researcher Describes New Synthesis Methods for Improved LK99-Like Materials

On the eve of Laojin’s opening of APS in March, I would like to write an understanding of the synthesis route and talk about the possible secrets of this synthesis.

(1) Understanding of the original formula

As we all know, the synthesis method of LK-99 is very simple (quoted by a financial blogger). Pyrite Pb2SO5 + cuprous phosphide Cu3P can be synthesized simply. However, this reaction mechanism has always been questionable.

One school of thought is that cuprous ions are conducive to crystal doping, so Cu3P is deliberately used, and the process of P replacing S is used to achieve Cu doping. Mechanistically, DFT seems to be able to explain this problem. But many people miss the core of this response. That is, Cu and P are already bound at the beginning. So can we change our thinking and understand that lead with S is doped into copper phosphate?

Pb2SO5+Cu3P→Cu3PO5+Pb2S→At this time, sulfur begins to replace O in the phosphate group, and at the same time fills in the vacancies, and Pb fills the copper salt→PCPSOSO. This seems to be a mechanism. The essence of Cu3P is actually to provide a strong reducibility, allowing S to better replace O.

(2) Metaphysical process

Divert to another topic.

In LK’s thin film patent, it can be noted that the chemical equation given is actually Pb10-xCux(PO4)S. This has been given in Zhihu transfer very early, which means that the S element must be very important. . This actually hinted at the importance of sulfur when I submitted the first preprint. I deeply suspect that the chemical formula given in the first preprint of LK-99 is actually a smoke bomb. Then he tricked a group of people into rushing forward but returned without success.

In fact, our initial thought was that 1 copper seemed to be a bit too little. At least 3 to 4 coppers were reliable, so we used hydroxyapatite as a precursor and started sintering to prepare apatite, but in fact Yes, when x>2, Cu can no longer be doped. LK-The 0.9~1.1 given in the original article is actually very reasonable. When the element in the hole is oxygen, it is difficult for Cu to enter. So, at this time, Teacher Chen took action and began to calculate the replacement of elements in the holes. He started to try replacing O with S. Of course, as mentioned before, the effect looks good.

But this time we seem to have discovered another problem, which is difficult to solve when repeating. That is, if co-precipitation is used, the magnetic properties will be rubbish! It is a simple diamagnetic property. Then I carefully checked the experimental records. The premise of the synthesis is that it is best to start directly with nano-copper phosphate. In other words, you cannot prepare a Cu+Pb mixed solution and then add phosphate to precipitate it. Instead, you need to prepare copper phosphate precipitate first, then add Pb to the solution, and then add phosphate. This is a metaphysical process. The key to this process may be the coating of nano-salt, but I don’t know much about the specific reason.

The picture below is a structure for Pb4Cu6(PO4)(O/S).

(3) High voltage to achieve S doping

I have always thought that SukBea Lee’s method is invincible, but I have never understood the secret. Why use such a complicated equation to implement the entire process. Later, when I thought about it carefully, I realized that it was actually pressure! Although it was explained during the experiment that the vacuum tube must be pumped to a very low vacuum. But everyone has overlooked that the product of this reaction contains S2↑. The extra gas will cause the vacuum tube to actually be under high pressure, which means that the value of P(S2) is very high! When P(S2) is very high, it is possible to replace O in holes and acid radicals. In the end, it is the formula PCPSOSO given by Professor Jin. It is precisely because the internal pressure may be different that when everyone reproduces, the results are varied.

So either use low temperature to prevent the sulfur from escaping and doping it, or use high pressure to slowly replace it. This synthesis is really interesting~

(4) Strange conductivity

I recently tried the synthesis of PCPSOSO powder (a lot of metaphysical variables are involved). When it came to the raw materials, Mr. Light Machine and Mr. Guan made it for me. I’m so happy! Use a briquetting machine to press the powder together and sinter it at 100°C. Because there is no professional electrical measuring equipment, everyone went home during the Spring Festival, so we can only test it with a broken multimeter. Probably, the room temperature resistance is a little lower than that of copper (copper is about 3Ω, PCPSOSO is about 2Ω, if my multimeter is short-circuited, it will be 1.9~2.0Ω, magic). It can only go so far. If my brothers in Beijing can help me measure the resistance using the four-wire method during the holidays, please contact me as soon as possible. Urgent to death~~~~~~~~~~. Teacher Qiao and Brother Xi both celebrated the New Year, and no one tested me.

What I believe is that the data given by LK should be reliable. As for TC, how should I put it? The actual jump should be around 350K.

6 thoughts on “New China LK99-Like Superconductor Research and Imminent Patent”

  1. Here’s a useful scientific model for understanding the transitions (such as from an insulator or semiconductor to a superconductor) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubbard_model

    Fermions such as electrons need to “move in” to “share a room” to become bosons. Having a high density of condensed-into-” “ground-state” bosons is necessary for superconductivity.

    Superconductivity has two parts: we must have conductivity and it must be super.

    We can get conducting electrons and/or holes in any pure insulator or semiconductor by introducing appropriate impurities (known as dopants.) We can get them to become super by pairing them up as bosons so that the formed bosons can obey a new statistic of quantum-state occupancy: the Bose-Einstein statistics. If these bosons have nearly the same energies and have few or hard-to-get-to quantum states to go to, they can become non-scatterable and thus carry a superconducting current.

    We want to get an ambient pressure room-temperature material with its electrical-charge carriers of sufficient density Bose-Einstein-condensed. “Ground state” is somewhat of a relative concept. It really means the energies available aren’t sufficient enough to bring about the occupancy of a new lower-energy quantum state.

  2. Tin metal is subject to tin pest so we can’t use it as structural material by itself. It, however, has a first-order phase transition at 13.2C changing from alpha tin to beta tin as its temperature increases. 13.2C = 273.15K+13.2K = 286.35K is definitely within room temperature. Taming unruly phase transitions for desirable technological ends may be possible. Remember that semiconductors used to be too finicky and good for nothing but nowadays we might get into a major war over them in Taiwan. Tin pest might be used for cleaving rocks, for example.

  3. Those two solutions I’ve mentioned need to be multiplied together to form the general solution to the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation.

    The E.U. banned lead-tin solder because of the toxic lead but the other component in the solder tin may be able to replace lead in the synthesis. Tin is in the same group as lead and its mass is fairly high, too.

  4. The new transductor age will need the manipulation of Bloch waves which are quantum wave functions in solids. To the more mathematically inclined, they are also called Bloch functions.

    These Bloch functions (or waves) have the form of two functions: a solution of the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation for a free electron, and a solution for motion of the electron in a periodic potential U(x) = U(x-a).

    See p. 875 of Physical Chemistry by Walter J. Moore ©1972 Prentice Hall, Inc. ISBN: 0-13-665968-3

  5. Lead will probably cause this material to be banned or restricted from being used widely in the E.U.

    There may well be better alternatives which don’t use any toxic materials.

  6. Maybe Iris Alexandra’s success in creating a tiny speck which levitated was actually due to her much faster process which allowed the sulfur contaminant/dopant to stay.

    It seems that the sulfur impurity is very difficult to be driven away completely during the synthesis despite some very long and persistent “oven time”. Iris Alexandra posted a video of her much faster process online which I saw (of course, her video didn’t contain the recording of the long “oven time”). Her fairly large-quantity bulk sample was shown partially broken and had the shape of having come from a round crucible. She probably didn’t produce it using the quartz-tube long baking process. I doubt that she succeeded because of her not having used high vacuum but used a shortened process.

    It’s why I said that strictly speaking, she wasn’t following the normal scientific procedure for replication but it might be the deciding factor in her achieving an apparent replication.

    This endeavor was probably much polluted by the profit motive related to patents. In any case, China doesn’t respect intellectual property rights so any Chinese patent cannot bar anyone else from using the inventions.

Comments are closed.