Highlights From the Nextbigfuture Interview with Stewart Allen
* IonQ systems are at room temperature
* IonQ manipulates ions with magnets and lasers and have software control on mostly FPGA chips
* IonQ are like atomic clocks, they do not have time limiting decoherence
* IonQ can invent and make any kind of quantum gate. It is a matter of software and tuning laser pulses.
* There are no errors from the fabrication of the qubits as the qubits are ions and not Josephson junctions.
* There are no idle errors, no readout errors and no qubit lifetime problem
* They could make 100-200 qubit modules and link them with optical interconnects.
* They can have modular scaling which is not possible or practical with the superconducting systems. Superconducting quantum systems need extreme cooling. This cooling limits the size of the systems
* Superconducting systems had proposed or were using access via a remote cloud computing submission of problems.
* IonQ will have quantum systems at specialized data centers and then at regular data centers. The reason for data centers is because the quantum systems generate so much data. You get more benefit by pairing them with a lot of classical computers to process the data.
* IonQ has a path to optical networking.
* IonQ has a confident path to scaling to thousands of qubits. They believe the error rates will let them get to thousands of qubits before error correction is needed.
* Error correction means you need a thousand times more qubits to get a number of useful error corrected qubits. You would need say one billion qubits to get to one million error corrected qubits.
IonQ is ramping up their improvement at a very fast rate. They are making revolutionary performance advances every day. Their strategy is to not release a commercial product now. They will ramp up improvement faster and then release when their lead and financing is such that they can support a product without slowing development.
They have done all this with only $22 million in funding from GV (Google Ventures), NEA (New Enterprise Associates) and Amazon AWS.SOURCES- Q2B Conference, IonQ, Youtube Written By Brian Wang
Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
4 thoughts on “IonQ Path to Thousands of Qubits and Quantum Supremacy”
For more fun, consider Roger Zelazny’s Amber series. The ruling family has the ability to walk through a near infinite number of alternative world-lines by focusing on certain aspects of what they wish to see until they arrive at that eventuality. To be fair, they often have to do it in many stages.
I don’t personally believe there is any collapsing wave function. An observer (define what that even is) being able to cause the whole universe to split or collapse, other than relative to itself? Really? More likely an observer can focus their awareness at the cost of losing sight of other probable outcomes.
Kind of like we look at a vast forest, and see a blur of trees all over the place, then focus and see one tree, and, when we look back to the forest, before focusing again on a single tree, it’s rather unlikely it would ever be the same tree.
Still, I wonder if it might be possible to use a quantum computing device to find a specific tree, or at least a specific kind of tree, before we have focused on any of them, then use it to aid us in focusing on that tree.
Logic and intuition hint the answer is “no,” and it probably is. But not everything in science is intuitive, and logic can fail where understanding is incomplete.
In short, I don’t want an app that picks the winning lottery number. I just want one that can guide my awareness, my consciousness, to world-lines where I already hold the winning number. But would the programmer even bother to distribute it?
Or if locality of the observer might be affected by it, and alter reality.
In simple: if traffic lights where controled by a QM how many cats would arive at work ? who had a traffic accident, and in which reality all cats survive..
If you assume that ≠ and it is very likely it is not equal, quantum computers can only solve a subset of problems quickly called BQP.
Many problems are not BQP.
Quantum computers will be great for some problems (especially physics simulations and travelling salesman problems) but not for all or even most problems.
EDIT: Formally proving your code is bug free can be a BQP problem if you wrote the program to be testable that way – so affordable quantum computers will improve software quality.
Almost makes you wonder what that level of quantum computing might do to the nature of reality, relative to the observer, of course.
Comments are closed.