Reviewing Current Opinions About LK99 Superconductors

The NY Times has some coverage summarizing the excitement and some of the activity around experimental and theoretical LK99 proposed room temperature superconductors.

The Condensed Matter Theory Center (CMTC) was created in 2002 by the University of Maryland with the Distinguished University Professor Sankar Das Sarma as its permanent Director. The support for CMTC comes from the University of Maryland and the Laboratory for Physical Sciences (LPS). Professor Sankar Das Sarma and the center have been making slams of the quality of Physics done by the others but say they expect they (or an authority that they know) will deliver clarity by this Monday. If Condensed Matter Theory Center just come up with an approval of what the “rushed travesty of physics” has already put out, then that will be pretty lame. They are claiming they will have higher quality physics on Monday. Ok. Show us what real physics looks like. Superior science or physics should hold up over time. If what they assert on Monday does not hold up for its main points for longer than the prior work, then their claims to superior physics will be hollow.

Eric Berger is Senior Space Editor at Ars Technica. Likes rockets. Author of the acclaimed book LIFTOFF, on the origins of Space. The chatter I’m hearing on the room temperature superconductor discovery has gone from mostly negative to cautiously optimistic over the last 24-48 hours. If this is really real, it’s huge. Amazing for the planet.

1 thought on “Reviewing Current Opinions About LK99 Superconductors”

  1. NYT and science articles.. two things that don’t go together.

    Next Big Future: Where you can read next year’s news reporting today!

Comments are closed.