SpaceX May Test Propellant Transfer During the Next Starship Launch

Lakiesha Hawkins, deputy associate administrator for NASA’s Moon to Mars program office, one of her slides (at a Congressional Committee presentation) said SpaceX is moving quickly toward the third Super Heavy/Starship launch and that this flight will include a propellant transfer demonstration.

Cutaway diagram was by Tom Dixon

SpaceX Has a $52 million cryogenic fluid management NASA Tipping point award.

This test would involve transferring super-cold propellant from one tank to another inside a Starship spacecraft. It’s a precursor to future, more complex demonstrations involving two giant Starships docked together in Earth orbit. Then SpaceX will be ready to send a Starship toward the Moon for a test landing without astronauts onboard.

The demonstration will include technology risk assessment, design and prototype testing, and in-orbit demonstration. It will also provide insights for larger vehicle-to-vehicle transfers, which is a key capability for SpaceX’s lunar lander.

This is a critical capability to enable the landing on the moon with SpaceX Lunar Starship.

10 thoughts on “SpaceX May Test Propellant Transfer During the Next Starship Launch”

  1. Hey Brian, I’d appreciate you crediting my work next time you use it. I the creator of the cutaway diagram.

    Tom Dixon

  2. I just don’t see transferring propellant from one tank to another will be very hard. I spoke with an engineer at ULA who was probably the leading expert on orbital depots. All aspects of cryogenic transfer and storage have been demonstrated whether in the lab or in orbit. He stated that, all that remains is to just demonstrate it in orbit and it would probably work the first time. I suspect that SpaceX will have demonstrated propellant transfer from tanker to insulated depot in LEO before the end of 2024. With MLI and cryocoolers, cryogens can be stored indefinitely.

  3. I suppose that doesn’t actually require them to make orbit, depending on how long the test takes. Even with the originally planned barely suborbital hop, they’ll be in zero g for a significant period.

    But if they’re carrying extra fuel to pull this off, why not make orbit, so they can do a real reentry test, too?

    • I was thinking based on the the Starship RUD the last time, that that sort of suborbital trajectory is the most conservative for quick re-entry of debris until they have greater confidence it will make it to a stable orbit.

Comments are closed.