Researchers think a new coating could allow spacecraft to get close as one solar radii (430,000 miles) from the Sun’s surface. This would be eight times improvement over the Parker Solar Probe.
The goal of a Phase 1 NIAC study is to determine how near a spacecraft might come the Sun using a novel, very high-reflectivity coating. Using this material to cover a thin solar shield and including a secondary silvered reflective cone between the shield and the spacecraft (to reflect away infrared radiation from the shield).
The Parker Solar Probe utilizes a solar shield comprising a lightly-coated carbon composite layer on top of four inches of carbon foam. However, the temperature limits of the shield restrict the closest approach distance.
urrently have co-funding to demonstrate that our new coating can allow a coated tank to reach cryogenic temperatures at earth distance from the Sun. This funds allow for continued coating development for our proposed Phase 2 NIAC to consider only coating issues relevant to being near the Sun. Specifically the optical and mechanical issues related to high temperature long-wave reflectors will be an area of study in our Phase 2 effort.
In Phase 2, we would compare these two materials, both theoretically and experimentally, to determine which is preferable for close Sun approach. We have models developed under our prior, cryogenic selective surface NIACs to use as a theoretical baseline. Experimentally, we considered using a high intensity solar simulator to test samples, but have discovered that the infrared emission from these simulators is much higher than that of the sun. So instead, we propose to use the sun itself as a high irradiance source (taking into account the filtering of the Earth’s atmosphere). A tracking reflective telescope would focus sunlight, collected over a large area, onto a small sample of material. Measuring the resulting temperature would provide insight into the performance of these materials.
Another Phase 2 task would add fidelity to the conceptual spacecraft design, with the input of a thermal analyst from Glenn Research Center and a structural engineer from Kennedy Space Center. Optimization and comparison of design solutions will proceed in a cooperative fashion. The design of components such as support struts must consider radiative issues to allow heat emission, yet operate under a very large thermal gradient. In addition, the secondary shield, which reflects long wave infrared away from the payload, has both optical and mechanical issues in its design that must be jointly addressed.
JPL has stated that future interstellar missions may require a slingshot maneuver around the Sun. Analysis shows that this future vehicle would need to approach the Sun to within 3 solar radii, and JPL believes that using our new coating may be the only feasible method to achieve this.
Approaching a star to within 5 solar radii (2.2 million miles) would enable a laser-pushed solar sail that reached 4.6% of the speed of light to decelerate at a target star.
The gravity slingshot around the sun to one solar radii could give speed of about 200 km/second but deploying a solar sail immediately as the sun is being passed would provide a lot more speed.

Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
I know from experience there is not a lot of scrutiny at Phase I of a NIAC grant. The concept could end up unworkable. I’d wait before getting too excited or thinking it’s a real capability.
Sir I think you are lost.
Project Icarus.
Imagine if people said this in the late 1700’s. Instead of voyages of discovery; telescopes; cathode ray tubes; electricity; chemistry; theoretical physics and the like – we just searched for a “cure for cancer.”
We would just be dirt poor (literally) and diseased.And maybe dead long before age-related cancer took hold What makes us all healthy and wealthy is science and technology. And nothing boosted these for America like the second world war and the space race.
And without our space technologies people would die en-masse from hurricanes, there would be no mobile phones, no GPS, no advanced electronics and materials and little understanding of the earth or its oceans. Few saw the connection in 1957.
Now see, Yeffen here is clearly making an effort. It’s not completely convincing yet, but it kind of looks on topic and vaguely interesting, at least until you try to make sense of it.
NZNZ on the other hand is just cut’n’pasting the same basic spiel that could have come from a spam email in 1995. There is nothing there. Get lost idiot.
I suppose Aerogel or Starlite would not work for space missions?
Waste of money. Spend it on cancer research or another deadly disease.
https://www.photonics.com/Articles/Holographic_Atomic_Memory_Produces_Photons_On/a61678
Don’t we need a probe that goes into the center of the sun?
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/themes/the-dual-nature-of-light-as-reflected-in-the-nobel-archives/
I think the punchline is: “But we have a plan. We are going to send it at night.”