There are three main types of nuclear fusion and PB11 (hydrogen-boron) is the most desired. PB11 nuclear fusion would have almost no neutron radiation but it takes 1 billion degree temperatures instead of 100 million for deuterium tritium or about 500 million for deuteriurm-deuterium.
The PALS laser facility in Prague has reported a major advance in hydrogen-boron (pB11) fusion. January, 2022 in Physical Review E article reported a 40-fold increase in fusion yield over previous experiments at the same facility in 2014. Researchers hit a target of boron nitride with some embedded hydrogen with a 2 TW burst of infrared laser radiation, focused down to an 80-micron spot. The 40-fold increase in fusion yield was simply by making the target thicker. The advance is both a step forward for hydrogen-boron fusion, which has the potential to provide cheap, totally clean energy, and an example of the sort of leaps that can occur in fusion research.
High-current stream of energetic α particles from laser-driven proton-boron fusion ABSTRACT
The nuclear reaction known as proton-boron fusion has been triggered by a subnanosecond laser system focused onto a thick boron nitride target at modest laser intensity (∼10^16 watts per square centimeter), resulting in a record yield of generated α particles. The estimated value of α particles emitted per laser pulse is around 100 billion thus orders of magnitude higher than any other experimental result previously reported. The accelerated α-particle stream shows unique features in terms of kinetic energy (up to 10 MeV), pulse duration (∼10 ns), and peak current (∼2 Amps) at 1 meter from the source, promising potential applications of such neutronless nuclear fusion reactions. They have used a beam-driven fusion scheme to explain the total number of α particles generated in the nuclear reaction. In this model, protons accelerated inside the plasma, moving forward into the bulk of the target, can interact with 11B atoms, thus efficiently triggering fusion reactions. An overview of literature results obtained with different laser parameters, experimental setups, and target compositions is reported and discussed.
The iodine laser at PALS needs 1.2 MJ input to produce a 600 J laser pulse. The fusion output from the latest experiment was 0.06 J, so the critical ratio of output energy to input energy is still about 80 times less than that achieved by LPPFusion’s FF-1, using a much less reactive fuel, deuterium. To reach net energy, HB11 Energy, Marvel Energy, Focused Energy and Innoven will need larger fusion generators Focus Fusion LPP Fusion. However, all the fusion companies and fusion researchers are working to overcome these challenges.
Brian Wang is a Futurist Thought Leader and a popular Science blogger with 1 million readers per month. His blog Nextbigfuture.com is ranked #1 Science News Blog. It covers many disruptive technology and trends including Space, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Medicine, Anti-aging Biotechnology, and Nanotechnology.
Known for identifying cutting edge technologies, he is currently a Co-Founder of a startup and fundraiser for high potential early-stage companies. He is the Head of Research for Allocations for deep technology investments and an Angel Investor at Space Angels.
A frequent speaker at corporations, he has been a TEDx speaker, a Singularity University speaker and guest at numerous interviews for radio and podcasts. He is open to public speaking and advising engagements.
Input: 1,200,000 joules
Output: 0.06 joules
Waste of effort.
PB11 fusion requires fast protons, the temperature is just a common parameter used in original concept of Thermonuclear Fusion. New ideas present ways to produce numerous acceleration of protons under influence of high-intensity short pulse laser, directed inside the target. So far the number of fast protons was not enough to get multiple fusion reactions. In other words, there is no “burn” of fuel, but “shooting” the Boron atoms with protons.
The low melting point of boron hydride (-165 C) is a bit of a pain, but still I would expect that a practical reactor of this sort would use pellets of frozen boron hydride at targets for the lasers.
That high, with that much nitrogen poisoning the reaction? That’s quite impressive.
Why nitrogen poisoning? Its not in a vacuum ?
The target was “boron nitride”.
What about freezing diborane (B2H4) into a solid pellet (melting point: -164°C) and using that as a target?
Is there not a fourth? Will anyone from this group be attending iccf 24 coming up July 25th through the 28th in Silicon Valley. I’m not a physicist but I’ve been following this for quite a while and I think the dam is about ready to break
The dam broke.
https://brilliantlightpower.com/news
Is there a reason you couldn’t have a small deuterium-Tritium sub-target on the Boron 11-Hydrogen main target? Like a black dot to focus the laser on; ignite the lower energy of activation faster reaction rate D-T and use the energy of that to fuse the rest of the Boron-Hydrogen target?
Offhand because D-T makes neutrons and D-T fuses at a much much lower temperature than p-B and will get in the way of the p-B reaction.
Well using a small target of D-T imbedded in the larger p-B would work like a blasting cap/detonator. When the laser targeting the D-T ignited it it would add to the energy imputed by the laser causing hopefully more fusion of the surrounding p-B. But yes the small amount of Neutrons produced would make it a dirtier burn; a trade off for more complete fusion per shot.
D-T burn temperature isn’t that high. I’m not sure it would add that much and not disrupt the laser energy hitting the Boron. If you want to make a mini thermonuclear device Fusion reactor then you use a hohlraum (what NIF does).